Bug#636286: tagging 636286

2012-01-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:35:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Aurelien Jarno dixit: > > >tags 636286 + wontfix > > Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the > locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc > are invalid… This has only be seen so far on m68k

Bug#636286: tagging 636286

2012-01-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Aurelien Jarno dixit: >> tags 636286 + wontfix > > Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the > locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc > are invalid… The wontfix tag has a somewhat complicated role. In practice, it generally means

Bug#636286: tagging 636286

2012-01-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: >tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… >thanks for doing so silently and with no reason. Maybe I should indeed, as you expressed so nicely, stop to care