On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:35:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>
> >tags 636286 + wontfix
>
> Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the
> locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc
> are invalid…
This has only be seen so far on m68k
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>> tags 636286 + wontfix
>
> Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the
> locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc
> are invalid…
The wontfix tag has a somewhat complicated role. In practice, it
generally means
Aurelien Jarno dixit:
>tags 636286 + wontfix
Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the
locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc
are invalid…
>thanks
for doing so silently and with no reason. Maybe I should
indeed, as you expressed so nicely, stop to care
3 matches
Mail list logo