Bug#636286: tagging 636286
Aurelien Jarno dixit: tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… thanks for doing so silently and with no reason. Maybe I should indeed, as you expressed so nicely, stop to care about open source projects. //mirabilos -- 22:20⎜asarch The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master 22:21⎜asarch And the distance between the craziness and geniality is only measured by the success 18:35⎜asarch Psychotics are consistently inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.120101250.20...@herc.mirbsd.org
Bug#636286: tagging 636286
Thorsten Glaser wrote: Aurelien Jarno dixit: tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… The wontfix tag has a somewhat complicated role. In practice, it generally means that the people responsible for that package are not going to be working on fixing this particular bug, and although that's a kind of strange piece of metadata to maintain, I tend to find it much more helpful than no response at all. While it would have been even nicer if the maintainer had said why and what avenues, if any, exist for helping out, I don't think that's necessary. Even for bugs marked wontfix, help investigating and working towards a fix tends to be appreciated. Sorry for the trouble and hope that helps, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120101234846.gc25...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net
Bug#636286: tagging 636286
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:35:10PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Aurelien Jarno dixit: tags 636286 + wontfix Uhm, why? If someone working for glibc upstream says that the locale files produced by the Debian patched version of glibc are invalid… This has only be seen so far on m68k. I don't plan to debug things on m68k, though *tested patches* are welcome. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102012343.gi3...@hall.aurel32.net
