On 2013-05-08 10:06 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> On 2013-05-08 09:37 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2013-05-08 03:32 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> The new version of libc6-amd64 has already been unpacked, but
>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 belongs to libc6:amd
Control: severity -1 serious
On 2013-05-08 09:37 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-05-08 03:32 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> OK, where is /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 pointing? To ld-2.13.so,
>> which does not exist.
>
> It ought to point at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so,
It does so in th
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #707185 [src:eglibc] libc6:amd64 does not replace libc6-amd64; preinst fails
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
707185: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707185
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
On 2013-05-08 03:32 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Package: src:eglibc
> Version: 2.17-1
> Severity: important
>
> This upgrade failed:
> [snip]
> Preparing to replace libc6-dev-amd64 2.13-38 (using
> .../libc6-dev-amd64_2.17-1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libc6-dev-amd64 ...
> Preparing
Package: src:eglibc
Version: 2.17-1
Severity: important
This upgrade failed:
$ sudo apt-get install linux-libc-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc-dev-bin libc6:amd64 libc6 libc6
5 matches
Mail list logo
