Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-12-19 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:11:00AM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > It is not strictly necessary, but it allows one to build reproducibly even > when not using dpkg-buildpackage, e.g. when trying to re-run a specific part > of the build via `debian/rules build` or something else. This is helpful to >

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-12-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Aurelien Jarno: > [..] > > It would be nice to have an explanation why the changes from your patch > are needed. See my comments below. > > >> diff -Nru glibc-2.24/debian/rules glibc-2.24/debian/rules >> --- glibc-2.24/debian/rules 2016-11-25 21:59:04.0 + >> +++

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-12-18 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-12-09 18:29, Ximin Luo wrote: > - the upstream folks > > Aurelien Jarno: > > On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno > >> wrote: > >>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only > >>>

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-12-09 Thread Ximin Luo
- the upstream folks Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno >> wrote: >>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only >>> one left to address in the version currently in

Bug#783210: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-07-22 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Aurelien Jarno: >> On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno >>> wrote: It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only one left to address in the version currently in

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-07-22 Thread Ximin Luo
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org +CC Mike Frysinger Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno >> wrote: >>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-06-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno > wrote: > > It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only > > one left to address in the version currently in experimental. > > > > Hi, GCC have now added

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2016-06-05 Thread Ximin Luo
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno wrote: > It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only > one left to address in the version currently in experimental. > Hi, GCC have now added support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH so we can use this

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2015-10-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-08-23 20:13, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Aurelien Jarno: > > I have just applied the part concerning point 1. For the 2 other points, > > from what I have understood there are now patches for gcc to define > > __DATE__ and __TIME__. So the question is should we still want to get > > this

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2015-08-23 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Aurelien Jarno: I have just applied the part concerning point 1. For the 2 other points, from what I have understood there are now patches for gcc to define __DATE__ and __TIME__. So the question is should we still want to get this changes in the glibc? In that case I would try to get these

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2015-08-21 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-04-23 23:30, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: Source: glibc Version: 2.19-18 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering umask username uname Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2015-04-23 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Source: glibc Version: 2.19-18 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering umask username uname Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that glibc could not be built reproducibly. The

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

2015-04-23 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
Jérémy Bobbio: 3. nscd uses the date and time of the build as a version marker. So a patch is added to allow the build date to be set externally. The date of the latest debian/changelog entry will be used instead of the current time for Debian. Reiner Herrmann noticed that the patch