Unidentified subject!
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
[Please cc me, I'm not subscribed to the list. Hopefully Mutt will set M-F-T correctly.] I notice that the etch4 version of nscd just released in 4.0r2 suddenly depends on libc6-i386. This is on amd64. I couldn't find anything about this using the lists.debian.org search engine, reading the changelog, the stable update doc, or the BTS. Is it just a mistake? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
Hi m68k and Hurd porters, You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is still not the case for m68k, and insufficient for Hurd in the current state. We want to release lenny with glibc 2.6 (see discussion with the Release Team in [1]), and it has been released upstream yesterday. We don't plan an upload to unstable immediately, we already have to make glibc 2.5 reach lenny first. Though, we hope to make the first uploads during DebConf. Bringing a new glibc upstream into Debian is a lot of work, and waiting for m68k and Hurd to support TLS properly is sadly not an option we can consider. [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-glibc%40lists.debian.org/msg31594.html [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/04/msg00161.html On behalf of the Glibc Packaging Team, -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgp2jKTA7VXsc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: TLS support [was Re: Unidentified subject!]
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:20:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is still not the case for m68k, and insufficient for Hurd in the current state. The last time this came up, someone said they would work on it for m68k. That apparently hasn't happened. We want to release lenny with glibc 2.6 (see discussion with the Release Team in [1]), and it has been released upstream yesterday. We don't plan an upload to unstable immediately, we already have to make glibc 2.5 reach lenny first. Though, we hope to make the first uploads during DebConf. Bringing a new glibc upstream into Debian is a lot of work, and waiting for m68k and Hurd to support TLS properly is sadly not an option we can consider. I would like to help out on this issue since it doesn't seem like it will get done by someone else. Is there any documentation available for porting TLS to a new architecture? I have a basic understanding of the concepts but not the implementation details. Presumably the order of work needs to be 1) fix binutils, 2) fix gcc, 3) fix glibc. If this is correct, I can pull the source for binutils and start taking a look. Is there anyone that would be a good contact point for questions about this once I start looking at it? I presume there are also specific versions of each package that need to be fixed, not just whatever is current from upstream. Brad Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TLS support [was Re: Unidentified subject!]
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:20:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is still not the case for m68k, and insufficient for Hurd in the current state. The last time this came up, someone said they would work on it for m68k. That apparently hasn't happened. We want to release lenny with glibc 2.6 (see discussion with the Release Team in [1]), and it has been released upstream yesterday. We don't plan an upload to unstable immediately, we already have to make glibc 2.5 reach lenny first. Though, we hope to make the first uploads during DebConf. Bringing a new glibc upstream into Debian is a lot of work, and waiting for m68k and Hurd to support TLS properly is sadly not an option we can consider. I would like to help out on this issue since it doesn't seem like it will get done by someone else. Is there any documentation available for porting TLS to a new architecture? I have a basic understanding of the concepts but not the implementation details. Presumably the order of work needs to be 1) fix binutils, 2) fix gcc, 3) fix glibc. If this is correct, I can pull the source for binutils and start taking a look. Is there anyone that would be a good contact point for questions about this once I start looking at it? I presume there are also specific versions of each package that need to be fixed, not just whatever is current from upstream. There is a quite good pdf on Uli's page. Search Ullrich Drepper on google, you should be able to find it. IIRC there is the explanation on how it has been implemented for a few archs, quite extensively annotated. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpsTUoUtmYJ9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Unidentified subject!
Pierre Habouzit wrote: Hi m68k and Hurd porters, You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is still not the case for m68k, and insufficient for Hurd in the current state. We want to release lenny with glibc 2.6 (see discussion with the Release Team in [1]), and it has been released upstream yesterday. We don't plan an upload to unstable immediately, we already have to make glibc 2.5 reach lenny first. Though, we hope to make the first uploads during DebConf. Bringing a new glibc upstream into Debian is a lot of work, and waiting for m68k and Hurd to support TLS properly is sadly not an option we can consider. [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-glibc%40lists.debian.org/msg31594.html [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2007/04/msg00161.html On behalf of the Glibc Packaging Team, Hi Pierre, I got 2.5 to build with TLS but we need some changes to Hurd and gnumach to handle it. As I understand it we have even more issues with 2.6. Of course I'm certainly not the expert on the issue.. Thanks, Barry deFreese (aka bddebian) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TLS support [was Re: Unidentified subject!]
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: There is a quite good pdf on Uli's page. Search Ullrich Drepper on google, you should be able to find it. IIRC there is the explanation on how it has been implemented for a few archs, quite extensively annotated. Is this the document? http://people.redhat.com/drepper/tls.pdf It does seem to have quite a bit of technical detail. I'll look at it in more depth a little later. Thank you for the pointer. Brad Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TLS support [was Re: Unidentified subject!]
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:05:31AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: There is a quite good pdf on Uli's page. Search Ullrich Drepper on google, you should be able to find it. IIRC there is the explanation on how it has been implemented for a few archs, quite extensively annotated. Is this the document? http://people.redhat.com/drepper/tls.pdf It does seem to have quite a bit of technical detail. I'll look at it in more depth a little later. Thank you for the pointer. It is indeed. I don't think you'll read any better documentation about TLS elsewhere. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOOhttp://www.madism.org pgpe3a1xplLfj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Unidentified subject!
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 18 Dec 2004 04:31:32 -0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Clifton Darden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tired of going through long process 4 ur pills? Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 01:28:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--7038196238600434 7038196238600434 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Overweight, Always Tired, Depressed? Answers... http://www.peccavis9serfdom.com/?a5Q/f=3D0/5X5Y/LoiWZ trot tribesman dosimeter amanuensis andover doghouse barrier postlude thym= ine alvin=20 7038196238600434-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
Sie haben auf eine Nachricht geantwortet, die Sie ueber den Formmailer erhalten haben, und Antwort an [EMAIL PROTECTED] adressiert. Ueber diese Adresse kann die Nachricht nicht zugestellt werden. Bitte korrigieren Sie die Empfaengeradresse und senden Sie Ihre Antwort erneut. Bei Fragen schreiben Sie bitte an [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
$B!)(B (B (B (B-- (BTo UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bwith a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
$B!)(B
Unidentified subject!
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
Hi, I was upgrading my libc6 , after that I recompiled a new kernel , 2..4.22 with debian patches/lowlatency/preempt/supermount. After the compile I rebooted the computer to check if the new kernel boots , well it didn't boot. It got stuck on init ( no init scripts are being loaded). So rebooted and booted the same kernel with the boot option init=/bin/sh . After entering the prompt i tryed to do a ls but it segmentation faults , something like : init../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fork.c:132:__libc_f ( I didn't write down the rest because the message was to long). So i grabed the ck patch (this patch set include lowlatency/preempt/supermount/ and some more ) set and a vanilla 2.4.22 from kernel.org. I compiled this with the same config as in the 2.4.22 debian kernel . This kernel runs fine. altough some programs like mplayer , vlc segmentation fault sometimes , and the system feels _slower_ (realy slow). I even tried to reinstall my system but i got the same errors. Ali debian:/home/ali# aptitude search libc6 i libc6 - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data p libc6-dbg - GNU C Library: Libraries with debugging symbols i libc6-dev - GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files i libc6-i686 - GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] i libc6-pic - GNU C Library: PIC archive library i libc6-prof - GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries. debian:/home/ali# gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.2/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux Thread model: posix gcc versie 3.3.2 (Debian) debian:/home/ali# cat /etc/debian_version testing/unstable debian:/home/ali# _ Chatten met je online vrienden via MSN Messenger. http://messenger.msn.nl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unidentified subject!
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:06:30PM +0100, Ali Bombali wrote: Hi, I was upgrading my libc6 , after that I recompiled a new kernel , 2..4.22 with debian patches/lowlatency/preempt/supermount. After the compile I rebooted the computer to check if the new kernel boots , well it didn't boot. It got stuck on init ( no init scripts are being loaded). So rebooted and booted the same kernel with the boot option init=/bin/sh . After entering the prompt i tryed to do a ls but it segmentation faults , something like : init../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fork.c:132:__libc_f ( I didn't write down the rest because the message was to long). So i grabed the ck patch (this patch set include lowlatency/preempt/supermount/ and some more ) set and a vanilla 2.4.22 from kernel.org. I compiled this with the same config as in the 2.4.22 debian kernel . This kernel runs fine. altough some programs like mplayer , vlc segmentation fault sometimes , and the system feels _slower_ (realy slow). I even tried to reinstall my system but i got the same errors. Did your previous kernel have an extraversion starting with a dot? Something like 2.4.22.number. If so, use libc6 2.3.2.ds1-9 which fixes this bug. Ali debian:/home/ali# aptitude search libc6 i libc6 - GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data p libc6-dbg - GNU C Library: Libraries with debugging symbols i libc6-dev - GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Header Files i libc6-i686 - GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] i libc6-pic - GNU C Library: PIC archive library i libc6-prof - GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries. debian:/home/ali# gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.2/specs Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.3 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib --enable-objc-gc i486-linux Thread model: posix gcc versie 3.3.2 (Debian) debian:/home/ali# cat /etc/debian_version testing/unstable debian:/home/ali# _ Chatten met je online vrienden via MSN Messenger. http://messenger.msn.nl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
Unidentified subject!
reassign 175526 gcc-3.2 thanks m68k gcc-3.2 is under building by me, and it's gcc bug, not glibc. I reassign this bug from glibc to gcc-3.2. -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 22:38:54 2002 X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 31572 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 03:38:53 - Received: from unknown (HELO pub.foshan.gd.cn) (218.13.92.41) by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 03:38:53 - From: =?GB2312?B?ueO2q8qht/DJvcrQ0vi71LTvu6/Rp7P9ubi8wdPQz965q8u+?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: =?GB2312?B?xNrIvLv6y67A5M+1zt64r8q0s/25uA==?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain;charset=GB2312 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:38:13 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.7 tests=SUBJ_HAS_Q_MARK version=2.01 ×ܾÀíÄúºÃ£¡ ¡¡ÒÔÏÂÐÅÏ¢Óйء°ÄÚȼ»úË®ÀäϵÎÞ¸¯Ê´³ý¹¸¡± ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÊÇרҵ´ÓÊÂÑз¢¸ß·Ö×Ó»¯¹¤²úÆ·µÄ¿ÆÑÐÆóÒµ¡£±¾¹«Ë¾ÑÐÖÆ¿ª·¢µÄ¸ßЧ¹ÌÌåÖÐÐÔ³ý¹¸Áé»·±£²úÆ·£¬ ¾ßÊÀ½çÁìÏÈˮƽ£¬ÊÇÐÂÒ»´ú¸ß¿Æ¼¼×¨ÀûÇåÏ´²ÄÁÏ£¬¿ª´´ÁËÄÚȼ»úË®ÀäȴϵÎÞ¸¯Ê´³ý¹¸³ýÐâÇåÏ´µÄÏȺӡ£ ʲôÇé¿öÏÂʹÓóý¹¸Á飺 1.ÀäȴϵÔøʹÓÃӲˮ¡¢»ýÓÐË®¹¸ÌúÐ⣻ 2.ƽʱˮÎÂÕý³££¬µ«¿ªÀäÆøʱˮιý¸ß£» 3.´ò¿ªË®Ïä¸Ç£¬ÀäÈ´Ë®¹ý¶ÈÎÛ×Ç£¬ÓÐÐâ°ß£» 4.Ë®ÎÂÕý³££¬µ«·¢¶¯»úÓб¬ÕðÏÖÏó£» 5.¸ßËÙÐÐʻʱ£¬ÀäÈ´·çÉÈÕý³££¬Ë®Î¹ý¸ß£» 6.Ë®ÏäÉ¢ÈÈÆ÷о¹Ü¶ÂÈûÑ»·²»³©Í¨£» ¸Ã²úÆ·ÊôÖÐÐÔ¡¢ÎÞ¶¾¡¢¿ÉÈÜÐÔ99.95%¡¢³ý¹¸ÂÊ´ï96%£»¾ÖÚ¶àÓû§Ê¹ÓÃ֤ʵ²úÆ·¶ÔË®ÀäϵµÄ½ðÊô¼þ¡¢Í¡¢ ÂÁ¡¢Îý¡¢Ï𽺼þ¡¢Ë®·âµÈÎÞÈκθ¯Ê´¡£ ¶ÔÓÚÄÚȼ»úÓÉË®¹¸¡¢ÌúÐâËùÒýÆðµÄË®ÎÂÆ«¸ß¡¢·¢¶¯»ú¹ýÈÈÏÖÏó£¬Ê¹ÓøòúÆ·ÇåÏ´ºó£¬Äܽ«»úÌåË®µÀÖÐË®¹¸¡¢Ìú Ðâ³¹µ×Çå³ý£¬Ê¹Ë®ÀäϵɢÈÈЧ¹û»Ö¸´µ½Õý³£Ë®Æ½¡£ ÓûÏëÁ˽â²úÆ·¼Û¸ñ£¬ÖªµÀ¸üÏ꾡µÄ²úƷʹÓÃ×ÊÁÏ£¬¾´Ç봹ѯÈÈÏߵ绰£º0757-3819087¡¢·¢µç×ÓÓʼþµ½ [EMAIL PROTECTED]»òä¯ÀÀÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÍøÕ¾http://www.cnyhd.comÐÅÏ¢¡£ ££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££ ÆóÒµÃû³Æ£º¹ã¶«Ê¡·ðɽÊÐÒø»Ô´ï»¯Ñ§³ý¹¸¼ÁÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ ͨѶµØÖ·£º¹ã¶«Ê¡·ðɽÊлªÔ¶¶«Â·Æ½Ô¹¤ÒµÇø Áª ϵ ÈË£ºÁº¹ú»ù ¹«Ë¾ÍøÕ¾£ºhttp://www.cnyhd.com µç×ÓÐÅÏ䣺[EMAIL PROTECTED] µç»°ºÅÂ룺0757-3819087 ´«Õ棺0757-3960856 ---ÒÔÉÏÓʼþÄÚÈÝÓëÖÐ×ÊÔ´ÍøÂç¼°Èí¼þ¿ª·¢ÉÌÎÞ¹Ø--- --- ÖÐ×ÊÔ´ÍøÂç--ÓòÃûÏÈ×¢²áºó¸¶¿î;Ö÷»úÏÈ¿ªÍ¨ºóÊÕ·Ñ¡£ ÉêÇë100MÐéÄâÖ÷»ú350Ôª/Ä꣬Ë͹ú¼ÊÓòÃû+5¸öÐÅÏä http://www.263nic.com/ --- »¶ÓʹÓÃÒÚ»¢EmailϵÁÐÈí¼þ ÏÂÔصØÖ·: http://www.ehoosoft.com ¶¨ÏòÓÊÏäËÑË÷: ÒÚ»¢EmailËÑË÷´óʦ ÓʼþȺ·¢ÌØ¿ì: ÒÚ»¢EmailÓÊ²î ²¡¶¾Óʼþ¿ËÐÇ: ÒÚ»¢Email°²È«´óʦ .. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unidentified subject!
At Fri, 25 May 2001 11:10:42 +, norton wrote: hi, does anyone know where can I get a patch with the glibc fix for kylix to work IIRC, try to use the latest glibc deb in potato/woody/sid. -- gotom
Unidentified subject!
hi, does anyone know where can I get a patch with the glibc fix for kylix to work --- norton = Lvpvs pilvm mvtat, non animvm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
hi, does anyone know where can I get a patch with the glibc fix for kylix to work --- norton = Lvpvs pilvm mvtat, non animvm
Unidentified subject!
hi, does anyone know where can I get a patch with the glibc fix for kylix to work? -- norton = Lvpvs pilvm mvtat, non animvm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
Unidentified subject!
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unidentified subject!
Hello, sorry for bothering you, but I hope, you can help me. I've upgradet from debian 2.1 to 2.2 and now I'm missing some libraries, which have been in libc6-dev at release 2.1. At the moment, I miss /usr/include/errnos.h and /usr/include/gnu/types.h. On http://www.debian.org/releases/2.2/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en .html I couldn't find any hint on splitting libc6-dev. Where has my libraries gone? Any help is appriciated. Regards, Kerstin
Unidentified subject!
0subscribe
Unidentified subject!
0subscribe