Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-20 Thread Clint Adams
We believe that we have disposed of every patch but the following four: locale/LC_COLLATE-keywords-ordering.diff localedata/tailor-iso14651_t1.diff hppa/submitted-nptl-carlos2.diff any/submitted-strfry.diff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:46:23PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 5/19/07, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? > > > >I'm just in a hurry to get the packaging tweaked so that I can build and > >upload 2.6 to experimental, whether

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 5/19/07, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? I'm just in a hurry to get the packaging tweaked so that I can build and upload 2.6 to experimental, whether or not we have regressions from 2.5. Then we can see how it builds and works

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Clint Adams
> Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? I'm just in a hurry to get the packaging tweaked so that I can build and upload 2.6 to experimental, whether or not we have regressions from 2.5. Then we can see how it builds and works everywhere, get the outstanding patches re-evaluated

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 5/19/07, Carlos O'Donell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is your eta for having this cleaned up? Better put, when would you like these patches cleaned up? Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 5/19/07, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am available for discussing these patches. > > Some may already be upstream. For example I've committed the "r19use" > patch to ports already, and some of the nptl changes have been > committed already. > > Where is the debian-glibc svn? svn

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Clint Adams
> I am available for discussing these patches. > > Some may already be upstream. For example I've committed the "r19use" > patch to ports already, and some of the nptl changes have been > committed already. > > Where is the debian-glibc svn? svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-glibc/ I'll commit what I've

Re: glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-19 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 5/18/07, Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I took a brief look, and concluded that the following modifications will allow all the patches to apply. The lines that have been commented out represent patches that need to be reviewed and either fixed or thrown out. This is based on the 2.6

glibc 2.6 patch status

2007-05-18 Thread Clint Adams
I took a brief look, and concluded that the following modifications will allow all the patches to apply. The lines that have been commented out represent patches that need to be reviewed and either fixed or thrown out. This is based on the 2.6 tarballs and a CVS snapshot of ports from 20070517.