H. J. Lu writes:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > H. J. Lu writes:
> > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:16:56AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > > > PROTECTED]> said:
> > > >
> > > >
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:35:07 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> works ok until building glibc with the just built
Matthias> compiler. _Unwind_Resume, _Unwind_GetRegionStart are
Matthias> referenced by glibc objects, _Unwind_GetIP, _Unwind_SetGR,
Matthias>
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 12:49:38 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> ok, I'm currently bootstrapping gcc-3.3 with the patch
Matthias> attached, a glibc bootstrap using this compiler did
Matthias> succeed. I'll upload the fixed gcc-3.3, when bootstrap and
Matth
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> H. J. Lu writes:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:16:56AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > > PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > Matthias> glibc now fails to bu
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:35:07PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> David Mosberger writes:
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > said:
> >
> > Matthias> glibc now fails to build from source:
> >
> > Matthias> undefined reference to `__gcc_pe
David Mosberger writes:
> > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Matthias> glibc now fails to build from source:
>
> Matthias> undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0'
>
> Argh, looks like we may have to leave unwind-c.c in LIB2ADD
H. J. Lu writes:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:16:56AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > said:
> >
> > Matthias> glibc now fails to build from source:
> >
> > Matthias> undefined reference to `__gcc_personal
>
> please review the attached patch. you find the corresponding gcc
> package at http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-ia64/
>
> Matthias
>
FYI:
Accepted:
libunwind-setjmp0-dev_0.98.3-2_ia64.deb
to pool/main/libu/libunwind/libunwind-setjmp0-dev_0.98.3-2_ia64.deb
libunwind-setjmp0_0.98.3-
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> Matthieu Delahaye writes:
>> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 17:36, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24,
>> 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > ok, Ian, if
>> it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which > >
Matthieu Delahaye writes:
> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 17:36, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which
> > > plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared
> > > li
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 17:36, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which
> > plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared
> > libs.
>
> It's actually Matthieu's pa
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which
> plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared
> libs.
It's actually Matthieu's package so he needs to have the final say so;
it's a "rock and
David Mosberger writes:
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Matthias> From my point of view we can get around with it by
> Matthias> including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the
> Matthias> sarge release. I'm worried
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> From my point of view we can get around with it by
Matthias> including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the
Matthias> sarge release. I'm worried about the version skew of the
Matt
David Mosberger writes:
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
>
> Matthias> Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above
> Matthias> changes, or can it be done without it?
>
> If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of g
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Matthias> Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above
Matthias> changes, or can it be done without it?
If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of getting wrong
unwind-info into object-f
Ian Wienand writes:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> > That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which
> > is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of
> > GCC, it was implemented as part of libgcc_eh.a/libgcc_s.so.
>
> Act
17 matches
Mail list logo
