Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:01:07PM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff Log: * debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff: Don't include ISO14651 collation rules in C.UTF-8 locale.

Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Le 13/09/2011 16:53, Colin Watson a écrit : On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:01:07PM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff Log: * debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff: Don't include

Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:53:23PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:01:07PM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff Log: *

Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:33:19PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Yes similar problems have already been reported. This change has been done as a C locale should not have a collation order. Why not? Codepoint order collation is perfectly reasonable for a C locale. Lots of people use

Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:07:46PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:33:19PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Yes similar problems have already been reported. This change has been done as a C locale should not have a collation order. Why not? Codepoint order collation is

Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: Because it is supposed to replace the C locale, so to follow POSIX rules like the C locale. I am personally not convinced that we should go It’s supposed to offer a POSIX/C locale but with UTF-8 as character set instead of 7-bit US ASCII, like the “proper” POSIX/C locale,

Processed: tagging 641309

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641309 + pending Bug #641309 [eglibc] dpkg-architecture: strxfrm() gets absurd (on C.UTF-8) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641309:

Re: r4943 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Roger Leigh
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:03:01PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:07:46PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:33:19PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Yes similar problems have already been reported. This change has been done as a C locale should not

Processed: tagging 641309

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641309 + pending Bug #641309 [eglibc] dpkg-architecture: strxfrm() gets absurd (on C.UTF-8) Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #641309 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

r4970 - glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata

2011-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2011-09-13 22:04:58 + (Tue, 13 Sep 2011) New Revision: 4970 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff Log: Fix locale-C.diff Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/patches/localedata/locale-C.diff

r4971 - tzdata/trunk/debian

2011-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2011-09-13 22:56:22 + (Tue, 13 Sep 2011) New Revision: 4971 Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog Log: New upstream release. Modified: tzdata/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

Bug#641220: marked as done ([L10N,DE] tzdata: updated german debconf translation)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:19:33 + with message-id e1r3cgl-0003qu...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#641220: fixed in tzdata 2011j-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #641220, regarding [L10N,DE] tzdata: updated german debconf translation to be marked as done. This means

Processing of tzdata_2011j-1_amd64.changes

2011-09-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
tzdata_2011j-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tzdata_2011j-1.dsc tzdata_2011j.orig.tar.gz tzdata_2011j-1.debian.tar.xz tzdata_2011j-1_all.deb tzdata-java_2011j-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

tzdata_2011j-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-09-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: tzdata-java_2011j-1_all.deb to main/t/tzdata/tzdata-java_2011j-1_all.deb tzdata_2011j-1.debian.tar.xz to main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2011j-1.debian.tar.xz tzdata_2011j-1.dsc to main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2011j-1.dsc tzdata_2011j-1_all.deb to main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2011j-1_all.deb

r4973 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

2011-09-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Author: aurel32 Date: 2011-09-13 23:20:50 + (Tue, 13 Sep 2011) New Revision: 4973 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Upload to unstable Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

Bug#625250: marked as done (unloading a module with dlclose can fail and lead to crash)

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:33:25 + with message-id e1r3ctl-0001de...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#625250: fixed in eglibc 2.13-21 has caused the Debian Bug report #625250, regarding unloading a module with dlclose can fail and lead to crash to be marked as done. This

Bug#641309: marked as done (dpkg-architecture: strxfrm() gets absurd (on C.UTF-8))

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:33:25 + with message-id e1r3ctl-0001dk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#641309: fixed in eglibc 2.13-21 has caused the Debian Bug report #641309, regarding dpkg-architecture: strxfrm() gets absurd (on C.UTF-8) to be marked as done. This means

Processed: tagging 641309

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641309 + pending Bug #641309 {Done: Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org} [eglibc] dpkg-architecture: strxfrm() gets absurd (on C.UTF-8) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

r4975 - glibc-package/trunk/debian

2011-09-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Author: sthibault Date: 2011-09-14 01:01:39 + (Wed, 14 Sep 2011) New Revision: 4975 Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Fix changelog Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

Bug#641512: sys/timerfd.h does not compile with C99

2011-09-13 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libc6-dev-i386 Version: 2.13-20 Severity: normal File: /usr/include/sys/timerfd.h /tmp$ cat timerfdtest.c #include sys/timerfd.h /tmp$ gcc -std=c99 -c timerfdtest.c -o /dev/null In file included from timerfdtest.c:1:0: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys/timerfd.h:46:28: error: unknown

Processed: Re: Bug#641512: sys/timerfd.h does not compile with C99

2011-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 641512 + upstream Bug #641512 [libc6-dev-i386] sys/timerfd.h does not compile with C99 Added tag(s) upstream. # 20110914050207.GA2884@elie forwarded 641512 libc-al...@sourceware.org Bug #641512 [libc6-dev-i386] sys/timerfd.h does not