> This patch is already included in the Debian libc6 package. It actually
> may be the cause of the problem you reported.
This problem is already fixed in 2.11.1 or master. Have you also applied
the proper _second_ patch in that bug? C.f. my and H.J.Lu's comments and
mailing list posts.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > This patch is already included in the Debian libc6 package. It actually
> > may be the cause of the problem you reported.
>
> This problem is already fixed in 2.11.1 or master. Have you also applied
> the proper _second_ patch in tha
Gentile Cliente, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
Il vostro servizio BancoPostaonline e scaduto. Dovete rinnovarlo
subito altrimenti il vostro conto verra chiuso.
Se volete usare questo servizio in futuro, dovete procedere
subito.
Per continuare, Il modulo di aggiornamento e`allegato a questa
em
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:08:08AM -0500, root wrote:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.7-18
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I'm running Debian Lenny with a stock 2.6.26-2 AMD64 kernel, and after upgrading any of
my systems to us
Subject: libc6: reproducable segfault in printf / vfprintf
Package: libc6
Version: 2.10.2-2
Justification: breaks the whole system
Severity: critical
after found a segfault problem in libc6 i have tried to construct a
minimal programm, that produce that error.
the following code produces this se
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:38:15 +0100
with message-id <20100127133815.ga21...@hall.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#567116: reproducable segfault in printf / vfprintf
has caused the Debian Bug report #567116,
regarding reproducable segfault in printf / vfprintf
to be marked as don
Of cours,
you're right - compiling without -Wall -W was a mistake on reducing the
real code to that minimal example. But correcting the sample code in the
following way, so the argument order is correct doesn't help :
---
getopt/getopt_long is actually not supposed to return ':' if the
optstring does not _begin_ with a colon (e.g. ":g:") or a +/- sign
followed by a colon (e.g. "+:g" - this actually has another bug, but
that's not what this report is about).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 04:03:38PM -0700, Dave Serls wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:47:38 +0100
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 01:14:28PM -0700, Dave Serls wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:06:49 +0100
> > > Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 538916 normal
Bug #538916 [libc6.1-dev] libc6.1-dev: Conflicting definitions in
linux/ptrace.h and sys/ptrace.h on ia64
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 563882 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
Bug #563882 [libc6.1] ia64: memchr overshots
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11230'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
forwarded 563882 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11230
thanks
Hi Aurelian,
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:06:32PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> FYI: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10162
>> Maybe glibc 2.11.1 (which includes a cherry-pick of c
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:33:26PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > This patch is already included in the Debian libc6 package. It actually
> > > may be the cause of the problem you reported.
> >
> > This problem is already fixed in
13 matches
Mail list logo
