Bug#617894: [ARMel] tgammal isn't accurate enough

2011-03-12 Thread Julien PUYDT
Package: libc6 Version: 2.11.2-13 The following piece of code : #include stdio.h #include math.h int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { long double x = 6.0; printf (tgammal (%20Lf)=%20Lf\n, x, tgammal (x)); return 0; } Prints, on an x86 debian unstable (eglibc 2.11.2-11) : tgammal (

Bug#617894: [ARMel] tgammal isn't accurate enough

2011-03-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
tag 617894 + moreinfo thanks On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:48:53AM +0100, Julien PUYDT wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.11.2-13 The following piece of code : #include stdio.h #include math.h int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { long double x = 6.0; printf (tgammal

Processed: Re: Bug#617894: [ARMel] tgammal isn't accurate enough

2011-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 617894 + moreinfo Bug #617894 [libc6] [ARMel] tgammal isn't accurate enough Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617894: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617894

Bug#617331: Pushing tzdata updates to stable in time

2011-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing the tzdata update in tomorrow morning. Unfortunately, that didn't happen yet. Adding packages to

Bug#617894: [ARMel] tgammal isn't accurate enough

2011-03-12 Thread Julien PUYDT
Le 12/03/2011 12:11, Aurelien Jarno a écrit : On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:48:53AM +0100, Julien PUYDT wrote: Package: libc6 Version: 2.11.2-13 The following piece of code : #includestdio.h #includemath.h int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { long double x = 6.0; printf (tgammal

Bug#617331: Pushing tzdata updates to stable in time

2011-03-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 20:07 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Assuming everything goes according to plan (adding packages to squeeze-updates hasn't actually been tested yet) I'm planning on pushing the tzdata update in tomorrow morning.

Processing of tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes

2011-03-12 Thread Archive Administrator
/tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes is already present on target host: tzdata_2011c.orig.tar.gz Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes removed. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processing of tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes

2011-03-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
/tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes is already present on target host: tzdata_2011c.orig.tar.gz Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes removed. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To

Processing of tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes

2011-03-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.dsc tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.diff.gz tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb tzdata-java_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

tzdata override disparity

2011-03-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): tzdata-java_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb: package says section is java, override says libs. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database,

Processing of tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes

2011-03-12 Thread Archive Administrator
/tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes is already present on target host: tzdata_2011c.orig.tar.gz Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first. Job tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes removed. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processing of tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes

2011-03-12 Thread Archive Administrator
tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.dsc tzdata_2011c.orig.tar.gz tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.diff.gz tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb tzdata-java_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To

Bug#617331: marked as done (tzdata: Chile delay in 3 weeks the daylight time transition)

2011-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:51:12 + with message-id e1pyuqg-00038o...@valente.debian.org and subject line Bug#617331: fixed in tzdata 2011c-0lenny1 has caused the Debian Bug report #617331, regarding tzdata: Chile delay in 3 weeks the daylight time transition to be marked as done.

tzdata override disparity

2011-03-12 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): tzdata-java_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb: package says section is java, override says volatile/main/libs. tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says

tzdata_2011c-0lenny1_all.changes ACCEPTED

2011-03-12 Thread Debian Installer
Mapping oldstable to lenny-proposed. Accepted: tzdata-java_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb to pool/volatile/main/t/tzdata/tzdata-java_2011c-0lenny1_all.deb tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.diff.gz to pool/volatile/main/t/tzdata/tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.diff.gz tzdata_2011c-0lenny1.dsc to

Bug#617973: libc6-dev: wrong SOCK_CLOEXEC on hppa causes udev startup to fail and boot fails

2011-03-12 Thread Meelis Roos
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.11.2-10 Severity: important While debugging #617967 (udev fails to start on hppa and breaks boot) it came out that SOCK_CLOEXEC is defined wrong on hppa. Namely, asm-generic has O_CLOEXEC 02000 and SOCK_CLOEXEC is defined to that value. In addition,