Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2020-03-11 21:42:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 >> seems to be the exception. > > Well libc6-dbg is not a standard dbgsym package: > - It is a dependency for other packages > - It is a build-dependency for other

[Git][glibc-team/glibc][sid] 65 commits: First pass at new upstream release 2.30:

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno pushed to branch sid at GNU Libc Maintainers / glibc Commits: 60cc8cc3 by Adam Conrad at 2019-08-29T03:50:49-06:00 First pass at new upstream release 2.30: * New upstream release 2.30: - debian/symbols.wildcard: Add 2.30, and debian/control: Regenrate. -

Processed: severity of 953654 is wishlist

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 953654 wishlist Bug #953654 [libc6-dbg] libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 953654:

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-03-11 15:33, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: libc6-dbg > Version: 2.29-10 > > Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 > seems to be the exception. Well libc6-dbg is not a standard dbgsym package: - It is a dependency for other packages - It is a

Processed: Bug#953108 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953108 [src:glibc] glibc: CVE-2020-10029 Added tag(s) pending. -- 953108: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#953083 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953083 [src:glibc] __glibc_has_include macro needs to be restored until GCC is rebuilt Added tag(s) pending. -- 953083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

[Git][glibc-team/glibc] Pushed new tag debian/2.30-1

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno pushed new tag debian/2.30-1 at GNU Libc Maintainers / glibc -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/tree/debian/2.30-1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][glibc-team/glibc][sid] releasing package glibc version 2.30-1

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno pushed to branch sid at GNU Libc Maintainers / glibc Commits: 65972890 by Aurelien Jarno at 2020-03-11T22:04:36+01:00 releasing package glibc version 2.30-1 - - - - - 1 changed file: - debian/changelog View it on GitLab:

Bug#953657: generate dependencies on libgcc-sN instead of libgccN

2020-03-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:glibc Version: 2.29-10 Tags: patch Please generate dependencies on libgcc-sN instead of libgccN. * libc6: Depend on libgcc-sN instead of libgccN. diff -Nru glibc-2.31/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk glibc-2.31/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk --- glibc-2.31/debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk

Processed: Bug#951237 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #951237 [src:glibc] glibc/mips: bpo patch: mips: Fix argument passing for inlined syscalls on Linux [BZ #25523] Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #951237 to the same tags previously set -- 951237:

Processed: Bug#951880 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #951880 [libc6-amd64] libcrypt.so.1 in bullseye Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #951880 to the same tags previously set -- 951880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#953654: libc6-dbg should be renamed (or at least Provide:) libc6-dbgsym

2020-03-11 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: libc6-dbg Version: 2.29-10 Every other debug symbol package in debian is named $foo-dbgsym. libc6 seems to be the exception. Can we please rename this package (along with a transitional package to help folks upgrade from libc6-dbg) and set up an appropriate Provides: at least? This

Saludos

2020-03-11 Thread Mariana Quintal
Hola, bonito día, le escribo para invitarle a participar en el próximo evento de Seguridad Informática "El Lado Oscuro de la Red". Será impartido por un Hacker Israelí el próximo 23 de Abril en CDMX. ¿Me permite enviarle el temario para que pueda evaluar? Sí le interesa la información espero

glibc_2.30-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-03-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:02:51 +0100 Source: glibc Architecture: source Version: 2.30-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno Closes: 951237 951880 953083

[Git][glibc-team/glibc][glibc-2.31] 7 commits: debian/sysdeps/*.mk: stop building libcrypt for multilib packages. Closes: #951880.

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno pushed to branch glibc-2.31 at GNU Libc Maintainers / glibc Commits: e079ec4b by Aurelien Jarno at 2020-02-23T11:44:13+01:00 debian/sysdeps/*.mk: stop building libcrypt for multilib packages. Closes: #951880. - - - - - 7b2c0b4b by Aurelien Jarno at 2020-02-24T23:21:37+01:00

Processed: Bug#953083 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953083 [src:glibc] __glibc_has_include macro needs to be restored until GCC is rebuilt Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #953083 to the same tags previously set -- 953083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953083 Debian Bug

Processed: Bug#951880 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #951880 [libc6-amd64] libcrypt.so.1 in bullseye Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #951880 to the same tags previously set -- 951880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processing of glibc_2.30-1_source.changes

2020-03-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
glibc_2.30-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.30-1.dsc glibc_2.30-1.debian.tar.xz glibc_2.30-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[Git][glibc-team/glibc][sid] debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: depends on libgcc-sN instead of libgccN. Closes: #953657.

2020-03-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno pushed to branch sid at GNU Libc Maintainers / glibc Commits: d2498eb7 by Aurelien Jarno at 2020-03-11T22:31:09+01:00 debian/rules.d/debhelper.mk: depends on libgcc-sN instead of libgccN. Closes: #953657. - - - - - 2 changed files: - debian/changelog -

Processed: Bug#953657 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953657 [src:glibc] generate dependencies on libgcc-sN instead of libgccN Added tag(s) pending. -- 953657: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953657 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

glibc_2.30-1_source.changes REJECTED

2020-03-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
glibc_2.30-1.dsc: Invalid size hash for glibc_2.30.orig.tar.xz: According to the control file the size hash should be 17160400, but glibc_2.30.orig.tar.xz has 17158704. If you did not include glibc_2.30.orig.tar.xz in your upload, a different version might already be known to the archive

Processing of glibc_2.30-1_source.changes

2020-03-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
glibc_2.30-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: glibc_2.30-1.dsc glibc_2.30-1.debian.tar.xz glibc_2.30-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#953083: marked as done (__glibc_has_include macro needs to be restored until GCC is rebuilt)

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:21:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953083: fixed in glibc 2.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #953083, regarding __glibc_has_include macro needs to be restored until GCC is rebuilt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#953108: marked as done (glibc: CVE-2020-10029)

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:21:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953108: fixed in glibc 2.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #953108, regarding glibc: CVE-2020-10029 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Bug#953108 marked as pending in glibc

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #953108 [src:glibc] glibc: CVE-2020-10029 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #953108 to the same tags previously set -- 953108: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953108 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#951237: marked as done (glibc/mips: bpo patch: mips: Fix argument passing for inlined syscalls on Linux [BZ #25523])

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:21:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#951237: fixed in glibc 2.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #951237, regarding glibc/mips: bpo patch: mips: Fix argument passing for inlined syscalls on Linux [BZ #25523] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#951880: marked as done (libcrypt.so.1 in bullseye)

2020-03-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:21:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#951880: fixed in glibc 2.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #951880, regarding libcrypt.so.1 in bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not