Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-05-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 02:45:41PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: >... > I wonder if it'd make sense for libc to be a virtual package, with > functionality provided by optimized builds and dependencies satisfied > via Provides. I don't know how well dpkg would cope with transitioning > between

Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-05-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey Aurelien, On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 11:53:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >One solution for this would be to ship the optimized library in the same >package as the default library. Now this is not acceptable for embedded >systems as they might not need that library and can't remove it. This

Bug#959874: locales: default date format for en_DK and other en_* should be improved

2020-05-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-05-06 13:52, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: locales > Version: 2.30-5 > Severity: wishlist > > I'm using LC_TIME=en_DK for the ISO 8601 date format, i.e. when > written with digits. But the default date format seems to be the > same one as LC_TIME=C and should be improved. This has

Bug#959874: locales: default date format for en_DK and other en_* should be improved

2020-05-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: locales Version: 2.30-5 Severity: wishlist I'm using LC_TIME=en_DK for the ISO 8601 date format, i.e. when written with digits. But the default date format seems to be the same one as LC_TIME=C and should be improved. This has currently been done only for US: $ for i in $(locale -a |

Bug#956418: src:glibc: Please provide optimized builds for ARMv8.1

2020-05-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-05-06 13:56, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey Aurelien, > > On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 11:53:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > >One solution for this would be to ship the optimized library in the same > >package as the default library. Now this is not acceptable for embedded > >systems as

Bug#959874: locales: default date format for en_DK and other en_* should be improved

2020-05-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2020-05-06 17:47, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2020-05-06 16:12:58 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2020-05-06 13:52, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > > Package: locales > > > Version: 2.30-5 > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > I'm using LC_TIME=en_DK for the ISO 8601 date format, i.e. when > > >

Bug#959874: locales: default date format for en_DK and other en_* should be improved

2020-05-06 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2020-05-06 16:12:58 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2020-05-06 13:52, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Package: locales > > Version: 2.30-5 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > I'm using LC_TIME=en_DK for the ISO 8601 date format, i.e. when > > written with digits. But the default date format seems to