Bug#249122: libc6: ldconfig: Creates spurious libncurses.so.5 symlink

2004-05-15 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
configuration error. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Re: Please test eglibc 2.9-23+multiarch.2

2009-08-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
und could be to follow gtk+-2.0's lead: keep the actual binaries in the lib package, but place them under /usr/lib and have the bin package just ship symlinks to them. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cg

Re: Bug#830734: procps: FTBFS[!linux]: 'HOST_NAME_MAX' undeclared

2016-07-10 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
ge was even intentional; copying debian-glibc for clarification. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu

Re: Bug#830734: procps: FTBFS[!linux]: 'HOST_NAME_MAX' undeclared

2016-07-12 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Craig Small writes: > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/local_lim.h:#define HOST_NAME_MAX 64 I just took a closer look and noticed the "-linux-" in this path. This is not a header I would expect kFreeBSD builds to use. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at deb

Bug#881185: libc0.1-dev: old netinet/tcp.h lacks TCP_KEEPIDLE

2017-11-08 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
s function) A closer look reveals that stock FreeBSD 10.x does define this symbol, so presumably kernel support is available but the installed headers are too old to reflect it. Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mi

Re: libc6: ldd: bogus check for read permission

2007-02-06 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
#x27;s too easy to circumvent in normal circumstances for that to carry much weight. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-17 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: important Tags: sid The call to dpkg --compare-versions in libc's postinst should compare against a higher version than 2.1.95-1; after upgrading to 2.3.1-1, I found that a lot of services (including in particular inetd and kdm) didn't work right until I r

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
ed I didn't remember that before 2.3.1 was > uploaded. Oh, well; it *is* called "unstable" for a reason... ;-) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
, Debian has always (rightly) placed a lot of value on infrastructure AFAICT. Thoughts? (Obviously this is too late to use for 2.2 -> 2.3, but it should be possible to complete the transition in plenty of time for whatever follows it [2.4? 3.0?].) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.m

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
reade and wait for bug reports on services that need > to be added to the list. Fair enough. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Bug#159723: libc6-dev: MADV_* undefined on m68k

2002-09-05 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.2.5-14 Severity: normal Tags: upstream The m68k version of fails to define the MADV_* constants, even though they are present in in the kernel sources (as of 2.4.19, at any rate). I acknowledge that the issue is not hard to work around, and that assuming the exist

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
ed I didn't remember that before 2.3.1 was > uploaded. Oh, well; it *is* called "unstable" for a reason... ;-) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
, Debian has always (rightly) placed a lot of value on infrastructure AFAICT. Thoughts? (Obviously this is too late to use for 2.2 -> 2.3, but it should be possible to complete the transition in plenty of time for whatever follows it [2.4? 3.0?].) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.m

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
reade and wait for bug reports on services that need > to be added to the list. Fair enough. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Bug#165258: libc6: Should restart services when upgrading from versions prior to 2.3

2002-10-17 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: libc6 Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: important Tags: sid The call to dpkg --compare-versions in libc's postinst should compare against a higher version than 2.1.95-1; after upgrading to 2.3.1-1, I found that a lot of services (including in particular inetd and kdm) didn't work right until I r

Bug#249122: libc6: ldconfig: Creates spurious libncurses.so.5 symlink

2004-05-15 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
configuration error. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]