Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 331405 libpam-ldap
Bug#331405: Accidential activation of nscd is too simple
Bug reassigned from package `nscd' to `libpam-ldap'.
tags 331405 patch
Bug#331405: Accidential activation of nscd is too simple
There were no tags set.
Tags added
reassign 331405 libpam-ldap
tags 331405 patch
thanks
It would be libpam-ldap which suggests libnss-ldap in my case. But
running apt-rdepends and analyzing it's output suggests that there are
35 packages which depends on nscd in etch today. That's depends as in
any of the relationships that
(Hoping I'm doing things right, first time for me...)
Gabor Gombas @ 2005-10-05 (Wednesday), 16:08 (+0200)
Also, the default negative-ttl for the hosts map is just 20 seconds
which I think _is_ a quite reasonable default.
If twenty seconds were the case, I wouldn't have complained. I had
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
Obviously something has automatically dragged nscd into my system as one
of it's dependencies. (It's marked A in aptitude) And having a software
cacheing dns lookups from disconnected moments doesn't really make a
laptop very
Gabor Gombas @ 2005-10-05 (Wednesday), 16:08 (+0200)
What is that something? Investigating the output of apt-cache rdepends
nscd, libnss-pgsql1 and libnss-mdns Suggests: nscd, and libnss-ldap
Recommends: it, but nothing Depends: on it. So you should've given a
choice by whatever package
Package: nscd
Version: 2.3.5-6
Severity: important
After some time of random dns failures I started tracking the problem
today, the first time I found a reproducable way to trigger it.
Obviously something has automatically dragged nscd into my system as one
of it's dependencies. (It's marked A
6 matches
Mail list logo
