Bug#888073: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
On 2018-02-09 15:20, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > El dv 09 de 02 de 2018 a les 15:02 +0100, Aurelien Jarno va escriure: > > The notion of "multiarch interpreter" doesn't exist. > > It does exist, but you do not accept it. You are now denying the > official support that exists in Debian. I love the way you use "official" here. > Use /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 as the program > interpreter and the program will work perfectly in Debian and > derivatives. I don't care about compatibility within Debian and derivatives. I care about the compatibility within the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Bug#888073: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
On 2018-02-06 01:55, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: > Debian glibc officially supports multiarch interpreter names, even for > traditional architectures. For instance, the multiarch interpreter for > x86_64 is /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 . There is > consensus among Debian-based distros. The notion of "multiarch interpreter" doesn't exist. On debian x86_64, the program interpreter is /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 just like any other x86_64 distribution. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
