Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1

2004-07-14 Thread GOTO Masanori
I guess this library should be added to libc6.udeb. You are right. Adding ssh is good idea. No problem. But it increases libc6.udeb size. Is it acceptable for considering floppy size? Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1

2004-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:32:50PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Adding ssh is good idea. libcrypt and libutil, I hope you mean :-) No problem. But it increases libc6.udeb size. Is it acceptable for considering floppy size? We don't put libc6-udeb on floppies, or indeed on any initrd images;

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1

2004-07-14 Thread GOTO Masanori
I guess this library should be added to libc6.udeb. You are right. Adding ssh is good idea. No problem. But it increases libc6.udeb size. Is it acceptable for considering floppy size? Regards, -- gotom

Re: Processed: Re: Bug#258956: Starting sshd fails because of missing libutil.s0.1

2004-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:32:50PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Adding ssh is good idea. libcrypt and libutil, I hope you mean :-) No problem. But it increases libc6.udeb size. Is it acceptable for considering floppy size? We don't put libc6-udeb on floppies, or indeed on any initrd images;