Re: Using SVN instead?

2004-03-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:31:27 -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: I'd like to put forward the idea of moving the repo to svn (and svn.debian.org). Talking with pere online, he wants to clean up the locales mess in our patches directory, some of which involves renames. renames have bitten us a few

Re: Using SVN instead?

2004-03-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Jeff Bailey wrote: I'd like to put forward the idea of moving the repo to svn (and svn.debian.org). Talking with pere online, he wants to clean up the locales mess in our patches directory, some of which involves renames. renames have bitten us a few times, and it would be nice to Stop The

Re: Using SVN instead?

2004-03-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:24:39PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Jeff Bailey wrote: I prefer svn over arch because svn seems to work close enough to cvs that I don't need to spend much time learning it. I also think that the upstream author of arch is an ass, but that should really be