Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2023-01-01 Thread Daniel Swarbrick
On 02.01.23 06:59, Mathias Gibbens wrote: OK, I'll begin uploading the previously mentioned packages with that change. That's good news, if it resolves the circular dependency conflict / stalemate in prometheus-{client-golang,client-model,common} that I wrote about in another thread. How

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2023-01-01 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Sun, 2023-01-01 at 16:24 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 12:26 PM Mathias Gibbens > wrote: > > > Depends: golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-3-dev | golang-github- > > > golang-protobuf-1-5-dev > > > >   The packages' Build-Depends were unchanged and still use the > > 1.3.5 >

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2023-01-01 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sun, Jan 1, 2023 at 12:26 PM Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > Depends: golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-3-dev | > > golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5-dev > > The packages' Build-Depends were unchanged and still use the 1.3.5 > protobuf library when building the package. > > Is this a safe/sane ch

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-31 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Sat, 2022-12-31 at 22:42 +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: >   I'll upload another version of LXD so it also builds with the > correct protobuf library version. Pulling on this thread, I found I had to (locally) modify eight other golang library packages to have a Depends: line like the following

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-31 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Thu, 2022-12-29 at 15:34 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > I see gobgp 3.9.0 is uploaded to unstable, but has autopkgtest > regression. > > > panic: protobuf tag not enough fields in StartBgpRequest.state: > > This is exactly the runtime panic caused by the combination of > golang-github-golang-pr

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 3:34 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > I see gobgp 3.9.0 is uploaded to unstable, but has autopkgtest regression. > > > panic: protobuf tag not enough fields in StartBgpRequest.state: > > This is exactly the runtime panic caused by the combination of > golang-github-golang-protob

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
I see gobgp 3.9.0 is uploaded to unstable, but has autopkgtest regression. > panic: protobuf tag not enough fields in StartBgpRequest.state: This is exactly the runtime panic caused by the combination of golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-3-dev and pb.go files generated by newer protoc-gen-go(either

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-28 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 12:12 AM Mathias Gibbens wrote: [...] > > Can you also push the commit in the "pristine-tar" branch? It doesn't > look like that made it up to salsa. > Done. > > I've temporarily disabled pb.go regeneration. I'll leave it to you to > > verify and upload. > > Is the co

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-23 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Fri, 2022-12-23 at 01:07 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 9:23 AM Mathias Gibbens > wrote: > [...] > >   Well, versions 3.x of gobgp still need the newer version of > > golang-google-grpc that's stuck in experimental; there's also the > > transition issue of golang

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-22 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Hi, On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 9:23 AM Mathias Gibbens wrote: [...] > Well, versions 3.x of gobgp still need the newer version of golang- > google-grpc that's stuck in experimental; there's also the transition > issue of golang-github-golang-protobuf-1-5-dev vs golang-github-golang- > protobuf-1-3

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-19 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 03:13 +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 10:23 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 01:52:32AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > >   Something related to protobuf has shifted in unstable, which is > > > now causing gob

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-14 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 10:23 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 01:52:32AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >   Something related to protobuf has shifted in unstable, which is > > now causing gobgp to FTBFS. I've tried to figure out the correct > > way to fix it, b

Re: Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-14 Thread Shengjing Zhu
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 01:52:32AM +, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > Hi all, > > Something related to protobuf has shifted in unstable, which is now > causing gobgp to FTBFS. I've tried to figure out the correct way to fix > it, but haven't been able to, so I'm asking the team for guidance. > It

Help fixing gobgp FTBFS

2022-12-14 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Hi all, Something related to protobuf has shifted in unstable, which is now causing gobgp to FTBFS. I've tried to figure out the correct way to fix it, but haven't been able to, so I'm asking the team for guidance. Currently building gobgp in unstable errors out with: > src/github.com/osrg/g