Re: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.8-1

2024-05-20 Thread Tom Parkin
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 23:27:09 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:35:01PM +0100, Tom Parkin wrote: > > Please could someone review and upload the updated package? > > Uploaded, thank you! > > Best, > Nilesh Thanks Nilesh, much appreciated :-) signature.asc Description:

Re: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.8-1

2024-05-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
ebian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp > > Please could someone review and upload the updated package? Uploaded, thank you! Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.8-1

2024-05-17 Thread Tom Parkin
Hi all, I've prepared a new go-l2tp release, 0.1.8-1, which fixes an issue reported by users whereby an SLI message from the L2TP server causes kl2tpd to tear the tunnel down. https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp Please could someone review and uploa

Re: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1

2024-02-20 Thread Tom Parkin
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:54:04 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Tom Parkin writes: > > > Hi folks, > > > > Would someone mind please reviewing and uploading > > golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1? > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/package

Re: Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1

2024-02-20 Thread Simon Josefsson
Tom Parkin writes: > Hi folks, > > Would someone mind please reviewing and uploading > golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1? > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp Looks good, although there were no tag for the previous Debian upload so d

Upload request for golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1

2024-02-19 Thread Tom Parkin
Hi folks, Would someone mind please reviewing and uploading golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp 0.1.7-1? https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp The package is updated to remove the L2TPIP6 transport test, which is failing due to the backport of an upstream kernel

Re: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2024-02-19 Thread Tom Parkin
gt;> > > >> > Hi Simon, > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > >> >> golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp > > >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/jas/golang-google-grpc/-/j

Re: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2024-02-15 Thread Tom Parkin
ems arch-specific: > > > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp/ > > > > It could still well be that something in salsa and debci VM, and the > > #1063746 reporter's machine, that is causing this -- but it seems this > > clearl

Re: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2024-02-14 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Wed, 2024-02-14 at 18:44 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > This problem happens for others: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063746 > > Interestingly the failure seems arch-specific: > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

Re: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2024-02-14 Thread Tom Parkin
e anything out from the Google docs. > > > > The tests work OK when run manually and when run as part of the > > package build here, so I think it must be something specific to the > > pipeline VM but I'm not sure what at the moment. > > > > In terms of the t

golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2024-02-14 Thread Simon Josefsson
Tom Parkin writes: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 18:05:23 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Tom Parkin writes: >> >> > Hi Simon, >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 20:15:11 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> >> golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

Re: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-18 Thread Tom Parkin
e branch, no? > > > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp/-/commits/debian/sid > > We tag debian releases with debian/ tag for easy tracking. LMK if I > misunderstood something. No, my mistake, you're quite right of course. I have

Re: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
anges on the debian/0.1.6-1 tag. Thank > you for catching the copyright for l2tp.h! > > Should I merge these changes on debian/sid? I think they are already in the same branch, no? https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp/-/commits/debian/sid We

Re: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Tom Parkin
Hi Nilesh, On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 01:38:58 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I've uploaded your package to NEW. However, please look at my commits. Thank you very much :-) I've just had a look at your changes on the debian/0.1.6-1 tag. Thank you for catching the copyright for l2tp.h! Should I mer

Re: RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
I've uploaded your package to NEW. However, please look at my commits. I also have a quick question -- is the interface of the library somehow architecture dependent? if so the "M-A: foreign" field should be dropped. Thanks for your contribution! Best, Nilesh signature.asc Description: PGP sig

RFS: golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp

2023-10-17 Thread Tom Parkin
Hi pkg-go, I am seeking a sponsor for the package golang-github-katalix-go-l2tp[1], which contains tools that are used by default by the NetworkManager-l2tp[2] plugin. Currently nm-l2tp users have to build/install the go-l2tp programs themselves if they wish to make use of them. The package has