snip/
You can download my current set at:
http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/SVGStock.tar.bz2
(for now, until I get my regular web hosting sorted out).
The requested URL /SVGStock.tar.bz2 was not found on this server.
snip/
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 13:58, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
all those can be added to svn now. I don't know if Sebastian is
working on this yet.
Look on :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=238903msg=4
the control-center,
Hi,
I'm not quite sure whether this is the right place to ask, but I'm a
bit puzzled about whether or not I should dare updating my xserver from
4.2.1 to 4.3.0.
The thing is, if I select xbase-clients, a whole host of packages are
marked for removal (see attached xbase-clients.txt.bz2).
You need to upgrade whole Xfree 4.3.0 as whole not just xbase-clients.
You can get list of installed xfree packages as:
dpkg --get-selections | grep -E `apt-cache showsrc xfree86 | grep Binary:
//;s/,//g;s/ /|/g;`
I'm not quite sure whether this is the right place to ask, but I'm a
bit
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:09:00PM +0100, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
The thing is, if I select xbase-clients, a whole host of packages are
marked for removal (see attached xbase-clients.txt.bz2). Other packages
seem to depend on this package updated, such as totem:
Try to update xlibs too, at
markus == markus schabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
markus snip/
You can download my current set at:
http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/SVGStock.tar.bz2 (for now, until I get my
regular web hosting sorted out).
markus The requested URL /SVGStock.tar.bz2 was not found on this
markus server.
Bah!
Hi all,
Is there a difference between -common and -data? I noticed (while building
GTK+ 2.4 debs for ppc) that glib/atk have -data and pango has -common. Was
not sure, so thought I should ask.
I'll put the debs up somewhere once they're finished and tested.
Thanks,
- Jeff
--
GVADEC 2004:
On 2004.03.24 14:50, Ondej Sur wrote:
You need to upgrade whole Xfree 4.3.0 as whole not just xbase-
clients.
I realize that. In synaptic, I selected all packages related to Xfree
that updates where available for. That's when I was shown the whole
bunch of packages that were to be removed.
Andreas Schmidt wrote:
I realize that. In synaptic, I selected all packages related to Xfree
that updates where available for. That's when I was shown the whole
bunch of packages that were to be removed.
Why were these packages being removed? What dependency was being
broken?
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
From: Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Names, -common vs. -data
Hi all,
Is there a difference between -common and -data? I noticed (while building
GTK+ 2.4 debs for ppc) that glib/atk have -data and pango has -common. Was
not sure, so thought I
Chipzz wrote:
I wondered that too, and extracted the gtk and atk packages into a
temp dir with dpkg-deb -x. It appears they contain the translations.
Why exactly those aren't included in the main packages, I don't
understand.
This is so that shared data is stored in a single architecture-
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:45:57PM +0100, Chipzz wrote:
I wondered that too, and extracted the gtk and atk packages into a temp
dir with dpkg-deb -x. It appears they contain the translations. Why
exactly those aren't included in the main packages, I don't understand.
It's so that you can
Chipzz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Jeff Waugh wrote:
Is there a difference between -common and -data? I noticed (while building
GTK+ 2.4 debs for ppc) that glib/atk have -data and pango has -common. Was
not sure, so thought I should ask.
I wondered that too, and extracted
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 11:24:39AM -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote:
I don't know why some some packages use -data and some use -common
for their arch-independent files.
I think Debian as a whole was not able to make up its mind on this
issue.
It would be nice if this would be consistent across the
Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Is there a difference between -common and -data? I noticed (while building
GTK+ 2.4 debs for ppc) that glib/atk have -data and pango has -common. Was
not sure, so thought I should ask.
I'll put the debs up somewhere once they're finished and
Hi,
alone from the name, I would guess that -common may be shared by several
packages (common pixmaps, translation files, dictionaries), while -data
is usually used by exactly one package and only introduced to safe space
on the mirrors.
Again, this is what I think when I read the names. Reality
BTW,
I wonder if it would be nice, now that XFree86 4.3.0 is in testing, to
have the gnome-randr-applet package i maintain be part of on of the
gnome meta packages or whatever, or also incorporate it in the gnome
subversion repo ?
For info, it is a small applet which allows to use the randr X
Hi all,
I have commited the necessary debian/ files to subversion for building
glade 2.5.0. I've built them myself here and as soon as Sebastian Bacher
looks at them and okays them he will be uploading them to experimental
for me.
The required files are at
Hello,
There's been some discussion at the #gnome-debian channel about
package naming for some shared libraries. Specifically, people
were discussing if libgnome-keyring, which has the following
library should be named: /usr/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0.0.0.
The package was named libgnome-keyring-0,
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:18 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
So, the dash should exist or not? I think it is important for consistency
and we can fix this for gnome2.6, maybe, so we do not impose one
more delay probability for sarge.
It's a hyphen-minus, not a dash. :)
signature.asc
quote who=Alexander Winston
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:18 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
So, the dash should exist or not? I think it is important for
consistency and we can fix this for gnome2.6, maybe, so we do not impose
one more delay probability for sarge.
It's a hyphen-minus,
21 matches
Mail list logo
