Meta-gnome3 dependency on xul-ext-adblock-plus (Bug #689858)

2013-06-04 Thread Johannes Rohr
Dear GNOME maintainers, while I do use adblock plus with Iceweasel, it seems a bit arbitrary to me that the gnome meta package declares a dependency on it. Adblock plus is not part of the GNOME desktop. In addition, it pulls in iceweasel which also isn't. What is the rationale behind this

Re: Meta-gnome3 dependency on xul-ext-adblock-plus (Bug #689858)

2013-06-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/06/13 11:29, Johannes Rohr wrote: while I do use adblock plus with Iceweasel, it seems a bit arbitrary to me that the gnome meta package declares a dependency on it. Adblock plus is not part of the GNOME desktop. In addition, it pulls in iceweasel which also isn't. What is the

Re: Meta-gnome3 dependency on xul-ext-adblock-plus (Bug #689858)

2013-06-04 Thread Johannes Rohr
Am 04.06.2013 11:40, schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: On 04/06/13 11:29, Johannes Rohr wrote: [...] Until now, I had assumed, that the policy regarding Debian's GNOME desktop was to closely reflect the official GNOME desktop as defined by upstream. I see that the gnome metapackage is not totally