Dear GNOME maintainers,
while I do use adblock plus with Iceweasel, it seems a bit arbitrary to
me that the gnome meta package declares a dependency on it. Adblock plus
is not part of the GNOME desktop. In addition, it pulls in iceweasel
which also isn't. What is the rationale behind this
On 04/06/13 11:29, Johannes Rohr wrote:
while I do use adblock plus with Iceweasel, it seems a bit arbitrary to me
that
the gnome meta package declares a dependency on it. Adblock plus is not part
of
the GNOME desktop. In addition, it pulls in iceweasel which also isn't. What
is
the
Am 04.06.2013 11:40, schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 04/06/13 11:29, Johannes Rohr wrote:
[...]
Until now, I had assumed, that the policy regarding Debian's GNOME desktop was
to closely reflect the official GNOME desktop as defined by upstream. I see that
the gnome metapackage is not totally
3 matches
Mail list logo