Michael Biebl writes:
> So, you see, it's not like we are sitting on our lazy asses
Hopefully no-one here thinks that. But without ongoing updates about
what is delaying the transition, we don't know what to think.
> it's just a lot of work and coordination efforts.
Thank you! It often seems l
Michael Biebl wrote:
> It is. I've filed relevant bugs for it [1] and after analysing what the
> evo/eds transtion entails, will file a transition bug now.
> (We will need to update some other libs, like tp-logger, tp-farstream,
> libgweather, etc along with evo/eds 3.8
> Some other things that
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:40:00AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
...
> > I sincerely would like some means of testing this new gnome-shell, but
> > right now its dependencies are too entangled in experimental mess. Maybe
> > it's only an updated gnome-core or gnome package that is missing in
Am 11.09.2013 12:57, schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> On 11/09/13 12:41, Johannes Rohr wrote:
>> And I really don't get what is still holding up GNOME 3.8.
>
> Right now it's the evolution-data-server transition, which is being worked on.
> After that happens, it'll probably be time to get mutter
Am 11.09.2013 13:37, schrieb David Roguin:
> According to the evoluton-data-server package (
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/evolution-data-server.html) it will be part
> of db6.0 incoming transition:
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/db6.0.html
That's very likely not going to be an i
Am 11.09.2013 13:18, schrieb Johannes Rohr:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>> On 11/09/13 12:41, Johannes Rohr wrote:
>>> And I really don't get what is still holding up GNOME 3.8.
>>
>> Right now it's the evolution-data-server transition, which is being worked
>> on. After that happens, it'll
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> > On 11/09/13 12:41, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> >> And I really don't get what is still holding up GNOME 3.8.
> >
> > Right now it's the evolution-data-server transition, which is being
> worked
> > on. After th
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 11/09/13 12:41, Johannes Rohr wrote:
>> And I really don't get what is still holding up GNOME 3.8.
>
> Right now it's the evolution-data-server transition, which is being worked
> on. After that happens, it'll probably be time to get mutter, gnome-shell,
> g-s-d
On 11/09/13 12:41, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> And I really don't get what is still holding up GNOME 3.8.
Right now it's the evolution-data-server transition, which is being worked on.
After that happens, it'll probably be time to get mutter, gnome-shell, g-s-d,
g-c-c and so into unstable, bringing the
Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> Le 08/09/2013 10:47, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
>
Or is there any principal reason not to update the remaining portions
of the GNOME desktop in Debian?
>>>
>>> I tried ; this is currently very difficult, because systemd is quite
>>> intricated with gnome-shell.
On 11/09/13 11:31, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> Le 08/09/2013 10:47, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
>
Or is there any principal reason not to update the remaining portions of
the GNOME desktop in Debian?
>>>
>>> I tried ; this is currently very difficult, because systemd is quite
>>> intricate
Le 08/09/2013 10:47, Osamu Aoki a écrit :
>>> Or is there any principal reason not to update the remaining portions of
>>> the GNOME desktop in Debian?
>>
>> I tried ; this is currently very difficult, because systemd is quite
>> intricated with gnome-shell. Switching everything at the same time
12 matches
Mail list logo
