Re: Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-06 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: An ITP is not needed. After all, this is just a new release of an existing package, with a different src name for technical reasons. Ok Opinions? Comments? Sounds good! Let me know if you want me to take a look at

Re: Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/08/14 13:25, Alberto Garcia wrote: On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: An ITP is not needed. After all, this is just a new release of an existing package, with a different src name for technical reasons. Ok Opinions? Comments? Sounds good! Let

Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-04 Thread Alberto Garcia
WebKitGTK+ 2.5.1 has just been published. This is the first development release of the upcoming 2.6 series. WebKitGTK+ has two APIs: the classic one and the more recent WebKit2. The classic one is now often referred to as WebKit1. WebKit1 supports GTK+2 and GTK+3, while WebKit2 only supports

Re: Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/08/14 15:20, Alberto Garcia wrote: WebKitGTK+ 2.5.1 has just been published. This is the first development release of the upcoming 2.6 series. WebKitGTK+ has two APIs: the classic one and the more recent WebKit2. The classic one is now often referred to as WebKit1. WebKit1 supports