Re: Missing correct version of libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev and libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev on debian unstable

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:44:37AM +0200, José A. Romero L. wrote: > I've just installed the latest packages (version 1.0.2-1+b1) and they seem to > be working fine. Thanks a lot! Ah, sorry for the noise -- the package tracker doesn't show binNMUs. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description:

Re: Missing correct version of libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev and libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev on debian unstable

I've just installed the latest packages (version 1.0.2-1+b1) and they seem to be working fine. Thanks a lot! Cheers, On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:04:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > >0.2.3.8,

Re: Missing correct version of libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev and libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev on debian unstable

Hello, On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:04:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >0.2.3.8, so we just need to binNMU enclosed-exceptions, right? > > I think you are right, a lot of binNMUs of the above two packages are also > shown here https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-haskell.txt It

Re: I need sponsor for packages of Haskell Relational Record

Thanks for uploading of haskell-th-data-compat. As next step, I pushed package plan and debianizations of some packages which are used in HRR (deeper depth first in dependency tree): - haskell-quickcheck-simple - haskell-th-reify-compat - haskell-hdbc-session - haskell-names-th Please sponsor

Re: Missing correct version of libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev and libghc-enclosed-exceptions-dev on debian unstable

Hi, >enclosed-exceptions's cabal file claims compatibility with lifted-base >0.2.3.8, so we just need to binNMU enclosed-exceptions, right? I think you are right, a lot of binNMUs of the above two packages are also shown here https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-haskell.txt G.