On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 04:24:12PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> Should we be doing -fno-PIE -fPIC instead?
Or dropping -fno-PIE entirely?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 834869 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keysafe".
I would like this package to be uploaded **to experimental**.
The reason for uploading to experimental is that Keysafe has not yet
undergone a full
Thanks for working on this.
I am close to releasing hledger[-*] 0.28, which should help with a lot
of dependency issues. If necessary, I can do it today ?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:00:04PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> That doesn't seem to have worked.
Should we be doing -fno-PIE -fPIC instead?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 01:44:03AM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Ah, interesting, I didn't realise one could dig like that through the
> dep chain. Looking at hledger-web -> libghc-yesod-static-dev ->
> libghc-css-text-dev, which seems to fail with a quickcheck unittest
> failure. Already reported
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 09:19:21PM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> I think in the long run, we'll want all our objects build with -fPIC, so
> adapting the OpenBSD patch seems like the right approach.
That doesn't seem to have worked.
