Processed: Re: Bug#963128: pandoc: conversion from docbook: missing space between firstname and lastname

2020-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 963128 2.9.1.1-2 Bug #963128 [pandoc] pandoc: conversion from docbook: missing space between firstname and lastname Marked as found in versions pandoc/2.9.1.1-2. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#963128: pandoc: conversion from docbook: missing space between firstname and lastname

2020-07-16 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/6541 On 2020-07-14 09:56:36 -0700, John MacFarlane wrote: > Indeed, this also happens with the current dev version of > pandoc. If you want this to be fixed, you'll get better > results if you submit the bug

Processed: Re: Bug#963128: pandoc: conversion from docbook: missing space between firstname and lastname

2020-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 upstream Bug #963128 [pandoc] pandoc: conversion from docbook: missing space between firstname and lastname Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded -1 https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/6541 Bug #963128 [pandoc] pandoc: conversion from docbook: missing space

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 19:32:41) > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:25:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Control: found -1 > > > > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:53:44) > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:25:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Control: found -1 > > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:53:44) > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:29:17) > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:02:53PM

Processed: Re: Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 Bug #965121 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [src:pandoc] pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory No longer marked as fixed in versions pandoc/2.9.1.1-2 and reopened. -- 965121: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965121 Debian Bug

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Control: found -1 Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:53:44) > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:29:17) > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16

pandoc_2.9.1.1-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-07-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:13:21 +0200 Source: pandoc Architecture: source Version: 2.9.1.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard Closes: 965121 Changes:

Processing of pandoc_2.9.1.1-2_source.changes

2020-07-16 Thread Debian FTP Masters
pandoc_2.9.1.1-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pandoc_2.9.1.1-2.dsc pandoc_2.9.1.1-2.debian.tar.xz pandoc_2.9.1.1-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#965121: marked as done (pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory)

2020-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:05:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965121: fixed in pandoc 2.9.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965121, regarding pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:53:44) > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:29:17) > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16 15:50:53) > > > > > Hi, >

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:34:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:29:17) > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16 15:50:53) > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Does disabling optimization help? I

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Adrian Bunk (2020-07-16 17:29:17) > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16 15:50:53) > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does disabling optimization help? I have it disabled for these > > > architectures in haskell-lambdahack and it

Re: The NEW queue process (Was: Re: Bug#964983: New Upstream Version)

2020-07-16 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Gard, On Tue 14 Jul 2020 at 06:04PM +02, Gard Spreemann wrote: > I'm sorry for picking up on the discussion on this list, but I do not > feel that I've been a DD for long enough to bring a naive question like > this to d-devel on my own – and since you do bring it up I'm tempted to > ask

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16 15:50:53) > > Hi, > > > > Does disabling optimization help? I have it disabled for these > > architectures in haskell-lambdahack and it did help in that case. > > I will try. Thanks for the

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-16 16:02:53) > Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16 15:50:53) > > Hi, > > > > Does disabling optimization help? I have it disabled for these > > architectures in haskell-lambdahack and it did help in that case. > > I will try. Thanks for the suggestion! Looking

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Mikolaj Konarski (2020-07-16 15:50:53) > Hi, > > Does disabling optimization help? I have it disabled for these > architectures in haskell-lambdahack and it did help in that case. I will try. Thanks for the suggestion! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt *

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Mikolaj Konarski
Hi, Does disabling optimization help? I have it disabled for these architectures in haskell-lambdahack and it did help in that case. Cheers, Mikolaj On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 3:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Source: pandoc > Version: 2.9.1.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs >

Bug#965121: pandoc: FTBFS on armel, armhf, mipsel: out of memory

2020-07-16 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: pandoc Version: 2.9.1.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Thanks for fixing #964822. Unfortunately pandoc now fails to build on armel, armhf and mipsel: | [112 of 158] Compiling Text.Pandoc.Writers.Markdown |