Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?

Hi, On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:01 AM Clint Adams wrote: > > possibly update the ghc While it does not address the mipsel build failure or the request for version 9+, I have been using a personal backport of that experimental package (8.10.7-1~exp1) in amd64 on bullseye (stable), where it works

Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?

9.0.2, on some projects with many files that are large and/or have lots of INLINE, allocates much less memory than all 8.* GHCs at least. https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5478#note_399647 On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:11 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Clint Adams

Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?

Quoting Clint Adams (2022-01-20 15:58:51) > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 02:42:13PM +0100, Marek Ľach wrote: > > I would like to ask if there're any foreseeable plans to possibly update > > the ghc to at least version 9.0.2 > > for the testing >

Re: Would you consider updating the ghc package to version 9 for Bookworm (testing) Debian?

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 02:42:13PM +0100, Marek Ľach wrote: > I would like to ask if there're any foreseeable plans to possibly update the > ghc to at least version 9.0.2 > for the testing > Bookworm distribution? My information may be out