On Tue, 22 Nov 2022, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022, Ivan Perez wrote:
Hi
Scott, thanks a lot for submitting Copilot 3.12.
I see that it is currently in Debian unstable, but not testing or in Ubuntu
Lunar.
Do you know why it's not making it through? Is there something blocking
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:13:51 +0200
Source: pandoc
Architecture: source
Version: 2.17.1.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk
Closes: 1023149
Changes:
pandoc
Hi,
I just noticed:
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=debian-haskell%40lists.debian.org
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=pkg-haskell-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.org
It seems Jonas is using a different maintainer address for packages than
other team members?
This is not a
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:37:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023149: fixed in pandoc 2.17.1.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023149,
regarding pandoc FTBFS on i386
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-11-24 03:00:41)
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Control: tags 1023149 + patch
> > Control: tags 1023149 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded
> > it to DELAYED/15. Please feel
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:00:41PM -0500, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Control: tags 1023149 + patch
> > Control: tags 1023149 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for pandoc (versioned as 2.17.1.1-1.1) and uploaded
> > it to
