On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 10:16PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting John MacFarlane (2023-11-16 19:25:17)
> > Removing lua support would be most unfortunate! If you need help from
> > upstream in getting things to work, let me know.
>
> I agree: Pandoc with its core scripting language disabled
Quoting John MacFarlane (2023-11-16 19:25:17)
> Removing lua support would be most unfortunate! If you need help from
> upstream in getting things to work, let me know.
I agree: Pandoc with its core scripting language disabled is a severely
crippled Pandoc.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard -
Hi John,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 10:25AM, John MacFarlane wrote:
> Removing lua support would be most unfortunate! If you need help from
> upstream in getting things to work, let me know.
We are currently tracking the latest Stackage LTS, and Lua support is
not enabled for Pandoc there (see
Removing lua support would be most unfortunate! If you need help from upstream
in getting things to work, let me know.
Hi Jonas,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 01:28PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Upstream project has restructured to now be organized as multiple
> projects to be built as dependencies of each other.
>
> I had hoped to be able to orchestrate such chain-of-builds internally in
> the single source package,
Quoting Paul Gevers (2023-11-16 11:22:45)
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:36:05 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Scott Talbert (2023-10-12 02:33:45)
> > > It looks like pandoc can be updated to v3.0.1 and be compatible with the
> > > dependencies that are in unstable currently (LTS 21). Can
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 06:36:05 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Scott Talbert (2023-10-12 02:33:45)
> It looks like pandoc can be updated to v3.0.1 and be compatible with the
> dependencies that are in unstable currently (LTS 21). Can you please let
> us know if there are any
