Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:31:48AM +0200, Kai Harries wrote:
> > recently there is a discussion[1] if excluding Happy and Alex from the
> > build dependency of GHC is worth the extra burden. For me it looks
> > like Happy and Alex is available on all architectures
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 10:31:48AM +0200, Kai Harries wrote:
> recently there is a discussion[1] if excluding Happy and Alex from the
> build dependency of GHC is worth the extra burden. For me it looks
> like Happy and Alex is available on all architectures where GHC is
> available.
>
> D
Hi,
recently there is a discussion[1] if excluding Happy and Alex from the
build dependency of GHC is worth the extra burden. For me it looks
like Happy and Alex is available on all architectures where GHC is
available.
Do you guys know of any major obstacles that would come up if GHC has
a build
