Hey Jonas,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:29PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I now found time to examine the situation more closely, and I see that
> > you chose upgrade pandoc-types and many other packages, which in turn
> > requires upgrading pandoc
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-08-08 20:23:48)
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-08-08 20:02:13)
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 17:31 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57)
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-08-08 20:23:48)
> Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-08-08 20:02:13)
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 17:31 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > >> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57)
> > >>> Quoting Robert Greener
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-08-08 20:02:13)
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 17:31 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57)
> >>> Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 15:20:34)
> On Sat,
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 17:31 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57)
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 15:20:34)
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
I would like to update some
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 17:31 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57)
> > Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 15:20:34)
> > > On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> > > > > I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-30 15:40:57)
> Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 15:20:34)
> > On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> > > > I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> > > >
> > > > /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-05-31 15:52:38)
> On Tue, 31 May 2022, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> > Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-05-31 15:04:51)
> >> On Mon, 30 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 15:18 +, Robert Greener wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:20
On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 11:27 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
>
> > > > > In thinking about the packages that are FTBFS when using
> > > > > LC_ALL=C, this is
> > > > > cause by somewhat of a regression in haskell-devscripts,
> > > > > since
> > > > > the
On Tue, 31 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
In thinking about the packages that are FTBFS when using
LC_ALL=C, this is
cause by somewhat of a regression in haskell-devscripts, since
the old
install recipe used to set LC_ALL=C.UTF-8[1] before running the
command
where most of these packages are
On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 09:52 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-05-31 15:04:51)
> > > In thinking about the packages that are FTBFS when using
> > > LC_ALL=C, this is
> > > cause by somewhat of a regression in haskell-devscripts, since
> > > the old
> > > install recipe
On Tue, 31 May 2022, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-05-31 15:04:51)
On Mon, 30 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 15:18 +, Robert Greener wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
Thanks to Jonas noticing that some of the
Quoting Scott Talbert (2022-05-31 15:04:51)
> On Mon, 30 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 15:18 +, Robert Greener wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> >>> Thanks to Jonas noticing that some of the lua packages failed to
> >>> build
On Mon, 30 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 15:18 +, Robert Greener wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
Thanks to Jonas noticing that some of the lua packages failed to
build
from source, I checked the one's I've uploaded and a few fail to
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 15:18 +, Robert Greener wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> > Thanks to Jonas noticing that some of the lua packages failed to
> > build
> > from source, I checked the one's I've uploaded and a few fail to
> > build
> > also because the
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:20 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> Thanks to Jonas noticing that some of the lua packages failed to
> build
> from source, I checked the one's I've uploaded and a few fail to
> build
> also because the locale is not set.
>
> Would you be able to upload the following
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 15:20:34)
> Hi Scott (cc Jonas),
>
> On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> > > I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> > >
> > > /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> > > latest
Hi Scott (cc Jonas),
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> > I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> >
> > /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> > latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
> >
> > To
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 14:04 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 12:48:42)
> > On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 08:49 +, Robert Greener wrote:
> > > > I use pbuilder indeed.
> > > >
> > > > If the build requires a UTF-8 locale set, then it is wrong to
> > > > rely
> > > >
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 12:48:42)
> On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 08:49 +, Robert Greener wrote:
> > > I use pbuilder indeed.
> > >
> > > If the build requires a UTF-8 locale set, then it is wrong to rely
> > > on
> > > the build environment doing that: The build routines should
> > >
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 08:49 +, Robert Greener wrote:
> > I use pbuilder indeed.
> >
> > If the build requires a UTF-8 locale set, then it is wrong to rely
> > on
> > the build environment doing that: The build routines should
> > establish
> > that!
>
> I'm not too sure how to set it to be
On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 10:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 09:05:48)
> > On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 16:49 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > I noticed that enough packages were avilable in experimental to
> > > bump
> > > pandoc to 2.10.
> >
> > You may want to
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-30 09:05:48)
> On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 16:49 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I noticed that enough packages were avilable in experimental to bump
> > pandoc to 2.10.
>
> You may want to wait until I've done commonmark-pandoc, then you can go
> to 2.10.1, up to you
Hi Jonas,
On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 16:49 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I noticed that enough packages were avilable in experimental to bump
> pandoc to 2.10.
You may want to wait until I've done commonmark-pandoc, then you can go
to 2.10.1, up to you though.
>
> ...or so I thought:
>
> I have
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2022-05-18 11:52:36)
> Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-18 09:09:56)
> > On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 19:07 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > > I'm not totally convinced of the need to use experimental for
> > > jira-wiki-markup - I think we can just upload it when we update
> > >
Hi again,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
>
> To make the task simpler, I
Hello,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
>
> To make the task simpler, I intend
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-18 09:09:56)
> On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 19:07 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > I'm not totally convinced of the need to use experimental for
> > jira-wiki-markup - I think we can just upload it when we update
> > pandoc.
> > So, let's hold off on that for now.
>
> I
On Tue, 2022-05-17 at 19:07 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> OK, a couple updates:
> - commonmark has been accepted from the NEW queue
Great!
> - I finally got gitit updated (I ran into a bug in haskell-devscripts
> that I had to resolve).
Thanks!
> I'm not totally convinced of the need to use
On Wed, 11 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
/Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
To make the task simpler, I intend to update the dependencies
Hello again,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
>
> To make the task simpler, I
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 22:54 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Upload known breaking packages to experimental, and then when
> dependencies are aligned in experimental upload them all to unstable.
Got it - Thanks!
--
Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-10 22:22:16)
> How does it work with [packages] that are dependent?
>
> e.g., jira-wiki-markup-1.3.5 can be uploaded its own but this will
> temporarily break pandoc-2.9.2.1 until pandoc is updated to 2.10.1.
> However, pandoc cannot be updated until
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
>
> To make the task simpler, I intend to
On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 15:58 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> I went ahead and uploaded filestore.
Great -- thank you again!
> I can also take care of gitit, as it
> seems that should just be updated to the latest release, as there's
> an
> open CVE and a couple bugs.
Thanks!
I'll get started on
On Tue, 10 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
Hello again,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
/Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on
On Tue, 10 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
/Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
To
Hello again,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
>
> To make the task simpler, I
On Mon, 2022-05-09 at 19:41 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> I uploaded commonmark. Since it is a new package to Debian, it has
> to go
> through the NEW queue, which could take a while (but usually Haskell
> packages seem to go pretty quick since they're pretty simple).
Thanks again, Scott!
--
On Sun, 8 May 2022, Robert Greener wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
/Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
Hello,
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 19:09 +0100, Robert Greener wrote:
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
> /Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
> latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
>
> To make the task simpler, I intend
On Sat, 2022-05-07 at 20:43 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Since you mention pandoc itself, I just want to mention that that's
> tracked in an independent git and I am happy to finalize and release
> changes to that - or even do all work on that package - as soon as
> possible to do so (i.e.
Quoting Robert Greener (2022-05-07 20:09:44)
> I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
Great!
> Is it okay to move hakyll, hslua, jira-wiki-markup, pandoc, and
> pandoc- types to be ahead of the LTS release?
I guess your question is mainly tied to maintaining the
Hello,
I would like to update some packages so that pandoc can be updated.
/Lots/ of packages would need to be updated to update pandoc to its
latest upstream (2.18). It is currently on 2.9.2.1.
To make the task simpler, I intend to update the dependencies so that
it can be bumped to 2.10.1, and
44 matches
Mail list logo
