On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:48:50PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I noticed that
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-authenticate
> is BD-Uninstallable almost everywhere. There's a newer version (2.3.2)
> in the package-plan, and the packaging in git is in sync with th
I believe hsp 0.8 / hsx2hs 0.12 are fine now[1]. The issue is that
the Happstack related packages like happstack-hsp, reform-hsp, etc,
need to be updated to use the new HSP library. The new hsp made a
couple great changes like switching from String to Text and changing
the package names, but that
Joachim Breitner writes:
> binNMUs scheduled (354 – see how the list of recent builds at
> https://buildd.debian.org/ is full of haskell-*). Why didn’t you say
> that you need the packages on i386?
Joachim,
I apologize if that sounded at all critical, as that certainly wan't my
intent.
The fact
Hi,
I wrote down a step-by-step instruction for Debian Haskell packaging. It's
basically for me (I easily forget things), but it might help.
http://www.mhatta.org/blog/2013/03/21/recipe-for-debian-haskell-packaging/
Best regards,
MH
2013/3/20 Michael Alan Dorman
> Daniel Silverstone writes:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 07:55 -0400 schrieb Michael Alan Dorman:
> Well, that, and if any of the stuff in experimental got autobuilt for
> i386. ;)
binNMUs scheduled (354 – see how the list of recent builds at
https://buildd.debian.org/ is full of haskell-*). Why didn’t you say
that you
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 08:12 + schrieb Daniel Silverstone:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:40:48AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:45:02PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > > Crud, and not packaged :-(
> > >
> > > Oh well, cabal here I come.
> >
> > Please help
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:11:59AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> I try to incorporate knowledge about packaging haskell into the
> cabal-debian package. It is used to debianize all the happstack packages
> which we upload to deb.seereason.com.
I played with cabal-debian and it seems quite easy to use
I try to incorporate knowledge about packaging haskell into the
cabal-debian package. It is used to debianize all the happstack packages
which we upload to deb.seereason.com.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Michael Alan Dorman <
mdor...@ironicdesign.com> wrote:
> Daniel Silverstone writes:
>
Daniel Silverstone writes:
> Mmm, I really should do that, shouldn't I? I guess I need to learn darcs
> first. Is there a single idealised tutorial on packaging haskell stuff, or
> should I just aggregate all the bits I have found thus-far?
If such a tutorial existed, I might be able to find ti
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:40:48AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:45:02PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > Crud, and not packaged :-(
> >
> > Oh well, cabal here I come.
>
> Please help package it instead, except where things (such as reform-hsp)
> are a dependency pro
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:45:02PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> Crud, and not packaged :-(
>
> Oh well, cabal here I come.
Please help package it instead, except where things (such as reform-hsp)
are a dependency problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:25PM -0500, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
> Nope. happstack-lite is a separate package:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/happstack-lite-7.3.0
Crud, and not packaged :-(
Oh well, cabal here I come.
Thanks for the help.
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone
Nope. happstack-lite is a separate package:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/happstack-lite-7.3.0
- jeremy
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Silverstone
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:26:27PM -0500, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>> The happstack package used to contain stuff.. but it is more
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:26:27PM -0500, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
> The happstack package used to contain stuff.. but it is more or less
> dead these days. The core of happstack is in happstack-server. The
That doesn't seem to contain Happstack.Lite though -- is that dead too?
D.
--
Daniel Silversto
Hello,
The happstack package used to contain stuff.. but it is more or less
dead these days. The core of happstack is in happstack-server. The
core can then be supplemented using a bunch of addons like acid-state
(native Haskell DB), happstack-hsp (type-safe, compiled type HTML
templates), web-rou
Il 17/07/2010 17:44, Jeremy Shaw ha scritto:
> Awesome work!
>
> Happstack 0.6 will add three new dependencies:
>
> - dlist
> - PSQueue
> - blaze-html
>
> So, if you have nothing else to do after gitit, you could start on
> those.. I hope to remove some packages to make up for adding new o
Awesome work!
Happstack 0.6 will add three new dependencies:
- dlist
- PSQueue
- blaze-html
So, if you have nothing else to do after gitit, you could start on
those.. I hope to remove some packages to make up for adding new ones,
but I am not sure what will be removed yet.
- jeremy
Il 17/07/2010 11:29, Joachim Breitner ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
>> The last happstack Debian package entered the archive just today (though
>> it may still require a few hours to reach all the mirrors).
>
> thanks for tackling this
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> The last happstack Debian package entered the archive just today (though
> it may still require a few hours to reach all the mirrors).
thanks for tackling this beast.
Are you also going to package gitit? Ah, according to
Il 17/07/2010 10:26, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> I haven't done many test so far and I already know of some things that
> could be fixed (see the many Lintian warnings, for example); anyway,
> testing is open to anyone: if you're using Debian unstable and would
> like to see a good Happstack
20 matches
Mail list logo
