Hi Joachim,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:36AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Please prepare a patched package.
Pushed!
Could you also take a look at haskell-js-jquery? I sent an email about a
week ago. After that, we should probably give back haskell-shake.
Thanks for reviewing/uploading my packages!
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 25.06.2016, 13:16 +0300 schrieb Ilias Tsitsimpis:
>
> I tested the above and it seems to work (both in my machine and the
> armhf architecture). Should I prepare an updated version of the package
> containing the above patch, or should we remove conduit-extra from armhf
> for
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:29PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> armhf fails to build conduit-extra due to an unspecified test suite
> problem:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-conduit-extra&arch=armhf&ver=1.1.13.1-1&stamp=1466081154&file=log
>
> Anyone interested in inv
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:43:22PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> The architecture field is not the right field, because the source
> package can in principle be built on the architectures. Instead, it has
> to be blacklisted by the wanna-build/buildd admins, so that it is not
> built for Debian.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 21.06.2016, 16:08 +0900 schrieb Sean Whitton:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:40:38PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > did not help :-(
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=agda&arch=armel&ver=2.5.1-2&stamp=1466427602&file=log
> >
> > Lets just remove agda o
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> did not help :-(
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=agda&arch=armel&ver=2.5.1-2&stamp=1466427602&file=log
>
> Lets just remove agda on arm*, shall we? Or do we have any reason to
> believe that there are users out there?
That almost certainly is the com
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:40:38PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> did not help :-(
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=agda&arch=armel&ver=2.5.1-2&stamp=1466427602&file=log
>
> Lets just remove agda on arm*, shall we? Or do we have any reason to
> believe that there are users out
Hi,
Am Montag, den 20.06.2016, 17:36 +0900 schrieb Sean Whitton:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:36:57AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > It may help to add
> > DEB_SETUP_GHC_CONFIGURE_ARGS += --ghc-options="-optc--param
> > -optcggc-min-expand=10"
> > to debian/rules; at least it has in the past.
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:36:57AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> It may help to add
> DEB_SETUP_GHC_CONFIGURE_ARGS += --ghc-options="-optc--param
> -optcggc-min-expand=10"
> to debian/rules; at least it has in the past. Unfortunately, this is
> already in place for haskell-openglraw. It
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 17.06.2016, 15:25 +0900 schrieb Sean Whitton:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Also, I fear that haskell-openglraw will not build on arm* due to
> > resource constraints:
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-openglraw
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:29:37PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Also, I fear that haskell-openglraw will not build on arm* due to
> resource constraints:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-openglraw
agda too (it wouldn't build on my laptop, so..)
What does one do in this
Hi,
armhf fails to build conduit-extra due to an unspecified test suite
problem:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-conduit-extra&arch=armhf&ver=1.1.13.1-1&stamp=1466081154&file=log
Anyone interested in investigating this?
Also, I fear that haskell-openglraw will not build on
12 matches
Mail list logo
