Re: Best VCS layout for our packages?

2015-06-15 Thread Clint Adams
I’d prefer C over B over A. How about you? C B A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150615184620.ga28...@scru.org

Best VCS layout for our packages?

2015-06-15 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, eventually, we will have to migrate away from Darcs, I’m afraid. If only that nobody can use his ignorance of darcs as an excuse to do work here :-). I’m sure some of you will be happy to hear that. But this opens a new can of worms: What is the best git-based packaging approach for us? I

Re: Best VCS layout for our packages?

2015-06-15 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Joachim, you wrote: It is not possible to check out just one package. But maybe        that is a good thing, for such a tightly coupled package set. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/600079/is-there-any-way-to-clone-a-git-repositorys-sub-directory-only with git 1.7 and sparse checkout

Re: Best VCS layout for our packages?

2015-06-15 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 20:30 +0100 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: Hi Joachim, you wrote:It is not possible to check out just one package. But maybethat is a good thing, for such a tightly coupled package set.