Re: packaging with stack

2016-10-19 Thread David Fox
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Damien Couroussé < damien.courou...@gmail.com> wrote: For the deployment of binaries, deb packages seems a good option to me. > So I was wondering if it could be possible to take advantage of the > dependencies installed by stack to build debian packages. ​You

Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?

2016-10-19 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:47:46AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 3) we need to patch ghc to work with llvm 3.8 and remove the armel stuff Not sure why this is a blocker and I don't particularly like the idea of losing git-annex on armel. > I will need help because I know *nothing* about

Re: shellcheck 0.4.4-2

2016-10-19 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:40:50AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Indeed. I rebased my unpublished local commit and pushed it now. Thank > you for the poke. Great, I've uploaded 0.4.4-3 to experimental to see if it builds with GHC 8.

Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?

2016-10-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, 3) we need to patch ghc to work with llvm 3.8 and remove the armel stuff I can do that. >1) Every -doc package generated by ghc 8.0.1-3 has lintian errors > because of

Re: packaging with stack

2016-10-19 Thread Damien Couroussé
Hello Sean, Le 17/10/2016 à 16:11, Sean Whitton a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:01:58AM +0200, Damien Couroussé wrote: >> > Does anyone here use stack to build Debian packages? Is it possible? > Could you explain why you'd want to do this? To take advantage of > upstream stack config

Re: shellcheck 0.4.4-2

2016-10-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Clint, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:59:01PM +, Clint Adams wrote: > Did you make a commit and forget to push? Indeed. I rebased my unpublished local commit and pushed it now. Thank you for the poke. Helmut

Re: packaging with stack

2016-10-19 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Damien, On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:02:56AM +0200, Damien Couroussé wrote: > I would like to package binary executables, but some dependencies are > not packaged yet in Debian. Okay, I think I see what you are asking. For official Debian packages, each dependency must be separately

Re: Which version of ghc will stretch have?

2016-10-19 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 3) we need to patch ghc to work with llvm 3.8 and remove the armel stuff > > I can do that. As discussed on IRC, we don't need to and should not do that. The upstream ghc 8.0.* release series uses llvm-3.7 and the Debian version should do the same. The GHC 8.2.*