Re: ghc 8.0.2 in unstable?
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:19:05AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > last thing: should we switch llvm? wrt #850915 I think the GHC 8.2 release candidates are targeting LLVM 4.0.
Re: ghc 8.0.2 in unstable?
Hello, >Sure, then we can start tracking Stackage LTS 8. I'm not really sure about the implications and how to do it, but I guess I'll get some help :) Uploaded in deferred/15 and committed on git. last thing: should we switch llvm? wrt #850915 G.
Re: ghc 8.0.2 in unstable?
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 09:39:47AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Can I start the fun? Unfortunately I won't be able to binNMU stuff like > I did in Ubuntu, so somebody else needs to help me :) > > let me know if this sounds like a good plan :) Sure, then we can start tracking Stackage LTS 8.
Re: ghc 8.0.2 in unstable?
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 09:39:47 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello, with Stretch released, > I guess it is time to do some haskell fun :) > > The work has been already done in Ubuntu, so it should be just a matter of > ~10-15 sourceful uploads and a lot of binNMUs as usual. > > Can I start the fun? Sounds good to me, but then again, I'm wasn't very active recently, so I'm not sure I can offer much help. >Unfortunately I won't be able to binNMU stuff like > I did in Ubuntu, so somebody else needs to help me :) I unfortunately can't help with that, as I don't have the rights. > let me know if this sounds like a good plan :) Regards Sven pgpj3fwKbSUrX.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
