The plans for the GCC 4.2 transition were described in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/06/msg8.html
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show
objections against the transition.
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show
objections against the transition.
I have objections :)
http://bugs.debian.org/433629
Yes, it's
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show
objections
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 07:49:22AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
...
cd src qmake-qt4
QMAKESPEC has not been set, so configuration cannot be deduced.
Error processing project file: /build/buildd/ipe-6.0pre28/src/main.pro
#v-
So what's special about hppa? All the other architectures
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 09:05:43AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 07:49:22AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
...
cd src qmake-qt4
QMAKESPEC has not been set, so configuration cannot be deduced.
Error processing project file: /build/buildd/ipe-6.0pre28/src/main.pro
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:16:27AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
The plans for the GCC 4.2 transition were described in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/06/msg8.html
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa, mips*, s390,
7 matches
Mail list logo