[ dropped alpha/mips/powerpc MLs from CC list]
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:59:28PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I'm one of the maintainers of the Debian package of monotone; I'm also
one of its upstream developers. For the new 0.36-1 package presently
in unstable, we decided to run the
John David Anglin writes:
believe this can be fixed. For example, libgmp treats hppa2.0w as
indicating a 64-bit runtime. I'm sure you have hit this.
no python's internal copy of libffi :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On 9/6/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote:
Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the
architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architecture.
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On 9/6/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote:
Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the
Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the
architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architecture.
This is not sufficient to configure runtime applications when multiple
architectures are supported by one kernel.
i'm not terribly familiar with the breadth of
Seems you misunderstood jda's above comment. We do not have a 64bit
userland on hppa. the 'hppa64' part of the target string represents
the architecture of the /kernel/. 64bit kernels run a 32bit userland,
hence hppa64-linux should be treated (so far) as hppa-linux.
No, the architecture
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
This has arisen on the PA since we have separate 32 and 64 bit tools.
In other architectures, a compiler flag is used to select the output
architecture.
Any interest in doing the unification of 32 and 64-bit? ISTR Jeff
Bailey
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
This has arisen on the PA since we have separate 32 and 64 bit tools.
In other architectures, a compiler flag is used to select the output
architecture.
Any interest in doing the unification of 32 and 64-bit? ISTR Jeff
On 06/09/07, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
This has arisen on the PA since we have separate 32 and 64 bit tools.
In other architectures, a compiler flag is used to select the output
architecture.
Any interest in
9 matches
Mail list logo
