On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:15:54AM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> This is really strange. If I run postgresql under gdb and break in
> the float4div function then I get the correct answer. If I remove
> the break point then I get the wrong answer.
> I am thinking I need to do the kernel upgrade y
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:34:51PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> Grant,
>
> yes, I will rebuild the kernel. which version and is there a tar file for it?
http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6/
Grab the latest 2.6.11-pa2 tarball here.
thanks,
grant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Hughes, Gregory Mark wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I've been working with PA-RISC processors from the days of the 710. I
> have never seen any processor related difference in floating point
> results using PA1.1 instructions. There is the possibility of a
> hardware
To answer your original question:
http://www.parisc-linux.org/faq/index.html#fxgfx
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:35:38PM +0530, Ramesh Sistla wrote:
> Putting it the other way, is there any card that supports 3D stereo on
> PA-RISC linux?
and to answer this one:
http://www.parisc-lin
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:09:10AM +, David Cosgrove wrote:
> GRAPHICS(2) 8/8 HPA4071B GSC slot 2 0040 7700 0x01 0x00
...
> 2/vmlinux root=/dev/sda4 HOME=/ console=tty0 sti=8/8 sti_font=VGA8x16
> TERM=linux
...
> With kernel image vmlinux-2.6.11-rc5-pa3-32 from parisc-lin
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:00:25PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Am I right that with /dev/sda1 mounted as /boot, if I am at say /var a
> cd /boot should go to the /dev/sda1 partition? If so, that /boot is empty as
> shown above.
>
> Now for the bad news ... cd / and then cd boot which should brin
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 04:45:37PM +, Stuart Brady wrote:
> If sda1 is mounted on /boot and it is empty, then yes, that's bad. If I
> understand correctly, --init-partition formats the partition, and as a
> result, clears any files that were it previously held...
correct
> If that's right, i
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 08:55:41AM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Done. And it boots 2.6.8-2-32-smp!
good. Now you know what to write up :^)
> >If that boots, then:
> >o unmount /boot
>
> No ... umount /boot or umount -f /boot comes back with:
> "device is busy"
Sounds like sda1 did not get moun
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:46:46PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> >I suggest at least 4-6GB for /
> If / is 6GB how can /boot be graranteed to be within the first 2GB of disk
> blocks?
Sorry - this is assuming the f0 partition is mounted as /boot.
> >then /var or /home for the rest depending on th
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 11:55:19PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Fourth try to identify error:
...
How about reading "palo --help"?
> SinoHub5:/etc# cat palo.conf
> --commandline=1/vmlinux initrd=1/initrd.img root=/dev/sda3 HOME=/
> --format-as=2
> --update-partition=/dev/sda
> SinoHub5:/etc# pal
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:05:34PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is an easier way to do this just to have a 50MB f0 partition and then a
> 50-200MB e2 partition that you mount as /boot?
no.
grant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:47:17PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Okay. Now I learned something else about parisc-linuxers ... add comments at
> the bottom. Who knew?
And a smarter mail handler that knows how to quote! :^)
> So, here's question 1: Why did you say:
>
> > Partition Start(MB) End(MB
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:05:23PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> The real question is "with the -e2 option" on what? Guess I'm tired because
> I know ask doesn't have fdisk.
Yes, you must be tired because you are "top posting". :^)
-e2 is either a palo parameter (when invoked from user shell)
or
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:41:45PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Thanks Grant,
>
> Looks like I'm going around one more time. I don't see how to get to
> the -e2 option in the standard installer.
One can't. That's a known problem with debian-installer.
> I guess you are suggesting I just
>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:52:58PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if this has any value or not, but I am happy to
> contribute it to PA-RISC/Linux Boot HOWTO with approval of those
> explicitly copied on this E-mail whose contributions I copied.
You have my permission to
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:27:52PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> HARD Booted.
> palo ipl 1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 21 15:14:05 MDT 2004
>
> Partition Start(MB) End(MB) Id Type
> 1 1 31 f0 Palo
> 2 321008 82 swap
> 31009 17366 83 ext2
Thi
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> 64bit binaries are pointless
That's not true in general. It might be true to mc.
Apps that want > 4GB address space have to be 64-bit.
grant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 08:38:58AM +0100, SteX wrote:
> Do you want me to build the same pkg with the `hppa64-linux-gcc' and
> provide it to you all?
> Or is it enough for the Debian purpose to have the 32-bit binary?
> Thank you in advance for your answer.
32-bit is sufficient right now - thanks.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 11:24:35PM +0100, SteX wrote:
> I would also like to submit a doubt: I used an HP9000/785 (C3k)
> workstation for my work. How can I be sure that I compiled it as 32-bit
> system binary of 64-bit system binary? If I remember well this C3k is a
> 64bit workstation, isn't it?
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:06:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bdale, I found out today that the d-i hppa netboot images for 2.6 have
> been broken for a while.
...
> I'm suprised this didn't come up in your recent testing though -- could
> it somehow only affect my a500?
I was able to boot an a500
ISTR Alan Cox once mentioned he could train a chicken to install Debian.
I couldn't find a reference in parisc-linux email...but
someone else did make that comment in 1997 on LWJ.
I thought chickens were stupid creatures.
But a story in todays' SJMN popped that bubble and I though folks
would be
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 07:45:15PM +, Joel Soete wrote:
> Taken this into account, I move parport_gsc.h into drivers/parport and
> remove stuff from parport_gsc.c
> (btw I add a gnu license to parport_gsc.h based on the one of parport_gsc.c
> ;-)
Committed. I'll roll the -pa number shortly.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 06:46:49PM +0100, Alexander Bartolich wrote:
> Please be so kind and show me the exact item on
>
> http://www.parisc-linux.org/faq/
>
> I can't find it.
I think the kernel mesg is obsolete and needs to be updated
to point at the "PA-RISC/Linux Boot HOWTO" by Thomas Mart
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:57:07PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Why does everyone care so much about these unaligned messages? They're
> > just informative. Can we get back to the actual problem:
> >
> > mv: cannot stat `/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/defaults.ini': No such file
> > or directory
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:41:40PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > What is good web site development software available by apt?
>
> To be run on HP's PA-RISC architecture? I'd advise to use nvi, or it's
> newer successor, vim.
I'm sure he meant an HTML authoring tool that has a WYSIWYG interf
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:29:12PM +, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote:
> Hi,
> I have tried mozill and firefox, neither work. So I consulted the www
> and apparently neither work on hppa. However Epiphany does. Is
> epiphany any good and is this still the state with mozilla?
http://lists.parisc-linux
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:13:46AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > A load or store from or to an unaligned address. eg a load-word from
> > an address that's not congruent to 0 mod 4. these are emulated, so the
> > message is purely informative (because they're slow).
>
> And is that generally in
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 05:31:52PM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote:
> I made a change to the interfaces file that is causing my A class 9000
> running a 2.4.26 Debian kernel not to boot (kernel panic when bringing up
> the interfaces).
Harry,
Odds are the tulip driver are involved and I like to k
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:33:55PM +, Dr Gavin Seddon wrote:
> The graphics is A4977A vusualize EG.
Good. That should work.
> How do I go about installing and configuring/running X?
Please post the /var/log/XFree86.0.log
after you run "startx" or "xinit".
Typically the resolution or color
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Michael Caldwell wrote:
> I'm sorry... after further investigation... it is not a network
> problem. I would have realized this earlier if the 'ping' utility had
> been included on the boot cd. Tests with 'nc' prompted me to check
> what was being written t
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:21:02PM -0500, Michael Caldwell wrote:
> Has anyone successfully installed on a J5600? I am trying to install
> over the network (booting from a CD)... but I am having trouble with
> the network interface. It is recognized during boot but it seems like
> the driver is not
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:07:26PM +, slord wrote:
> Hi,
> This is my first list. I have successfully inst. debian hppa. But, I
> cannot startx. How do I fix this?
By reading the Graphics FAQ:
http://www.parisc-linux.org/faq/graphics-howto.html
grant
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 08:11:01AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > 2) Grab the Debian-Installer from
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> >
> >and give it a try. Some things may not work right but
> >I'm pretty sure the kernel it uses will boot on c3700.
>
> actually,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:36:27PM -0500, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> Hi there --
>
> I am experimenting with Debian 3.0r1 and have a Visualize C3700 workstation.
> I have downloaded the HPPA images and have gone through the motions of
> installing the operating system.
Andrew,
I doubt the kernel
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:34:58AM +0100, Joerg Pareigis wrote:
> > You probably also need to add "initrd=" to the palo "kernel command line"
> > and "--ramdisk" paramater when running the user space palo command.
> > See "palo --help".
> >
> Yes I did.
> I added "initrd" in palo.conf:
> "--comman
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:30:47AM +0100, Joerg Pareigis wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm not shure I'm right here?
>
> I did upgrade my HP B180L from Kernel 2.4.21 to 2.6.8-1.
> The tulip-driver for network card was build-in in kernel 2.4.
> Now it must load as a module.
> I did insert it in /etc/modules.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:18:51AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > You know that there's no support for 64-bit userspace yet, right?
>
> No I did not. Apparently the person who asked me if hppa64 asm
> support was possible is using gcc on HPUX.
HPUX does have a working 64-bit user space.
I suppo
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:27:50PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Apparenlty GNU as do not like the addil line below:
>
> addil lt'overflow,%r19,%r1
> add %arg0,%arg1,%ret0
> ldw rt'overflow(%r1),%r20
> addc0,0,%r22
> stw %r22,0(%r20)
>
>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 08:55:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yep. vmlinux & initrd.gz are there. I was able to create a lifimage
> using palo. It even seemed to work, but
excellent.
> ... the installer doesn't have support for network installs.
> The install menu only provides CDRO
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 10:52:18PM -0400, Chuck Slivkoff wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I found more recent businesscard.iso &
> netinst.iso, but no boot.img lifimages (on
> people.debian.org/cdimage/testing). I've looked everywhere I could think
> of and did some creative google-ing, but can no
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 11:18:30PM +0200, Patrick Pichon wrote:
> >Update your kernel and switch to sarge ;)
...
> I'm on the testing branche ... here is my /etc/apt/sources.list
...
> My current kernel is 2.4.17-32
Patrick,
"update your kernel" in this case means you have to
select a newer versio
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:14:28AM +0100, James Morris wrote:
> Below is the complete output of cl.
> I still don't understand what the prob is.
I don't either.
...
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0.
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:05:04PM +0100, James Morris wrote:
> Hi All
> I have been running my RP5430 without a hitch for nearly a month, I wanted
> to start adding services so ran apt-get dist-upgrade.
> The box has come up with the root FS read only.
> This is causing me a few problems (as you m
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:34:03AM +0300, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> ---
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:36:55PM +0200, SteX wrote:
> > > How can it be possible that a 32bits kernel image works fine on
> 64bits arch?
> >
> > PA2.0 HW also supports binaries compiled for PA1.1 architectu
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 10:20:57AM +0200, Klaus Buchholzer wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I need hints for buying a monitor for parisc boxes.
>
> i have several parisc boxes with both hpux (10.20,11,11i) and linux (2.4.x).
> (712/100, 715/100, C360, C3600). I use them all in console mode (ttyS0).
> Never e
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 10:41:47AM +0200, Klaus Buchholzer wrote:
> BootRom Version2.3
AFAIK, this is the latest
> Linux version 2.4.17-32 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.0.4) #9 Wed Jun 23
> 15:48:224
upgrade the kernel to at least something 2.4.25ish.
See http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:11:46PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Wasn't PALO (the bootloader) also build-dependant upon 3.0 at some point?
Not really. It was a coincendence palo built with gcc 3.0 worked
and palo built with later gcc didn't. The bug was in palo and I'm
pretty sure paul fixed
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:21:33PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> So one of these machines will not boot SMP kernels? Shit. This means
> some things will need to change in debian-installer's logic.
No. It means we need to fix the parisc-linux kernel.
This is a known kernel bug and we've known it fo
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:36:55PM +0200, SteX wrote:
> How can it be possible that a 32bits kernel image works fine on 64bits arch?
PA2.0 HW also supports binaries compiled for PA1.1 architecture.
grant
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 11:24:04AM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Thanks for your inputs Grant, but I still can't get it to work ... replies
> follow your inputs below:
This will help you quote email properly:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
> Yes it reports GRAPHIC
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 09:07:34PM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Hi Daniele,
>
> I received and installed the Visualize EG/PCI card. I reloaded Debian
> from
> scratch. I chose monitor resolution 1280x960 at 85Hz since there was no
> 1280x1024 choice.
The card certainly supports it.
PCI Vi
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 12:07:10PM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm missing something really simple, but I don't seem to get able to
> get my
> J6000 to boot vmlinux-2.4.26-pa4-debian-64-smp. Okay, I did apt-get install
> vmlinux-2.4.26-pa4-debian-64-smp, I changed the symlink /boo
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:14:06PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> AFAIK, the general registers (integer) have interlocks so
> the depth of the pipeline is irrelevant. I don't know if
> that's true for FP regs in general or specific CPU models.
I was able to confirm this i
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:20:22PM -0400, R Clint Whaley wrote:
> In what I think ought to be true in theory, if fr5L is the target
> of a fp op, you must wait at least FPU pipe length clock cycles
> before using fr5R or fr5L. In practice,
> even in assembler, I never got close to peak until I use
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:59:36AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> No, it is not the same. We cannot generate "pass fpregs in general
> registers" as HPUX does, this would require tons of code in the linker
> and stubs into/outof to move parameters around to the right places.
> Aside from that majo
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:33:03AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Damn you. For reasons known only to my personal demons, I have developed
>
> :-) You truly are a wonderful creation, you know!
:^)
> > a pa-risc assembler kernel to make up for gcc's crappy single precision
> > performance, so I
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:48:01PM +0200, Daniele Antonozzi wrote:
> The kernel of woody (2.4.17) does not support usb mouse and keyboard,
> you need to install a recent kernel.
Reminder, newer auto-built kernels are available:
http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.4/
http://cvs.parisc-linu
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:58:11AM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed Debian hppa on my C3000. I had to use a
> serial console to do it. I installed X with tasksel. When I change
> back to graphics mode (pa con GRAPHICS(2)), the system boots, and
> at the end when it trie
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:22:46AM +, Joel Soete wrote:
> I run also a N system with 4Gb of ram (but linux could only used 2Gb)
> and just a small swap slice is enough (256Mb iirc)
PA8800 machines have a memory hole similar to N-class and the parisc-linux
VM support doesn't (yet) support that
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 10:39:58AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> try the doc link above; try "parisc2.0.pdf". The bits you want are on
> page 6-11 (for prefetch)
Keep in mind the original PA20 book had the prefetch for "read only"
mixed up with the prefetch for "read/write". There should be an
er
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 03:17:30PM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Selected kernel: /boot/vmlinux from partition 1
> Warning: kernel name doesn't end with 32 or 64 -- Guessing...
> This box can boot either 32 or 64-bit kernels...Only see a 32-bit kernel,
> using that ELF32 executable
> ...
>
> Could
On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 01:43:40PM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> I get all the way
> through the install to "Make the system bootable" and then it comes back and
> says "Unable to install Palo, you may still be able to remote boot by
> pointing at the installed system ..." (or something like that).
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:43:05PM +0300, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> unless you still want SMP, in which case you might prefer:
> http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.4/
true - sorry.
I forgot to mention SMP only builds on linux-2.6 but hasn't been
very well tested and probably doesn't work w
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:39:13AM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Debian on my J6000. Very smooth install ... congratulations
> to
> all on the hppa team. However, when I tried to install
> kernel-image-2.4.18-32-smp, I got a jillion unresolved symbols in Depmod
Did you
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 01:12:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> That's a *critical* bug.
It's not until someone (me probably) files a Bug Report.
Which package should I file it against?
> Please say you kept that deb around?
I did.
> We can use
> it in a chroot to find the bug in the integr
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> You can do this more easily by running
> ldconfig -m /target/lib /target/usr/lib
~ # ldconfig -m /target/lib/ /target/usr/lib/
ldconfig: invalid option -- m
Try `ldconfig --help' or `ldconfig --usage' for more information.
It
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> You can do this more easily by running
> ldconfig -m /target/lib /target/usr/lib
No ldconfig. Matthew and I discussed this offline.
Tried to unpack the .deb by hand and install the files
but found the root cause of the problem
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:28:36PM +, Joel Soete wrote:
> My unstable c110 runs fine with:
...
> ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
Yes - I've gotten a few other reports where it worked fine for others.
But it's pretty clear the libc6 shouldn't ever
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 12:49:10PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> System is basically useless until I cold install or fix up
> the /lib/ld.so.1 symlink.
I was able to netboot from:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-hppa/current/images/boot.img
and res
Heads up,
During an update from "dselect", my /lib/ld.so.1 went missing.
It's not clear if this is a kernel bug or a bug with the glibc update.
Verified /lib/ld-2.3.2.so is still present with "echo /lib/ld*".
System is basically useless until I cold install or fix up
the /lib/ld.so.1 symlink.
d
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:30:13PM +0200, Steffen Hein wrote:
> I successfully updated the firmware to v6.1 but my problem was mainly a
> internal gfx-card vs. external gfx-card issue. I removed the FX2-card and
> successfully installed a woody system (dist-upgraded to Sarge afterwards).
ah ok - t
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 01:27:42PM -0400, Harry Cochran wrote:
> I have several hppa boxes from a project a few years ago that
> I would like to be able to use with Debian Linux.
> I downloaded debian-30r2-hppa-binary-1
> and burned the iso with Nero (someone said Nero preserved the 512 byte
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:11:57AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> That's what the original question was about.
> For the past 6-12 monthes, we've mostly focused on 2.6 devel.
BTW, if someone wants to support 2.4 kernels, patches are welcome
as long as they are tested. Especially
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:08:10AM +, Kenneth Westelinck wrote:
> >There is no need to use unstable instead of testing!
> Ok, thanks for that.
yeah - testing has usually worked well with occasional minor brokenness.
(wow...see what the internet has done to my english! :^)
I've been running "te
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 09:58:04AM +0300, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Aren't all B132/180 comming with STIFB capable onboard video card?
No. I've seen Bxxx machines with no built-in graphics.
grant
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 10:32:54PM +0200, Steffen Hein wrote:
> ??Firmware?Version:??5.2
This isn't the latest (6.x).
...
> The last line is something like "if this is the last line ... look at the
...
> I've looked at the FAQ and read that boot problems might be associated with
> outdate
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 05:47:31PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > Just make it clear in the release notes and let the compile fail on
> > 2.4 with an #error, IMHO. Does that sound too lazy ?-)
>
> Yes. It's a runtime issue and nobody seems to read the release notes.
In other words, the next
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 05:52:49PM +, Joel Soete wrote:
> Hello Grant,
Hi Joel,
Please trim the replies to the parts you are replying to.
> imho if you don't have hw raid array (no clue about hp2100 sorry) why
> not building a sw raid5 for an economical and robust disk array (with
> several
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:13:22AM +0100, James Morris wrote:
> Thanks to all on the list I have gotten a lot further, I managed to get a
> palo partition and the setup completed without any errors, cd ejected and
> rebooted, I chose the partition and everything started booting then stopped,
> I re
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:10:36PM +0200, SteX wrote:
> Hi James,
> well the partman, th tool to partition the hdd, is not so user friendly
> as it could be for newer users. So consider to read the installation manual
> for HP-PARISC system.
> However if you need to install GNU/Linux on a HP-PARISC
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:43:17PM +0200, SteX wrote:
> >> 14. Unknown machine (0) at 0xfed21000 [33], versions 0x5e0, 0x0,
> >> 0x0
> I can't figure out the meaning of this phrase!
you clipped out a bit too much. This line was important:
| model 9000/800/L1500-6x
Either the firmware
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:30:00PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> > CONFIG_STIFB=y
> > grab arch/parisc/configs/c3000_config
>
> from my /boot/config-2.4.26-64-smp you can find:
>
> CONFIG_FBCON_CFB8=y
> CONFIG_FBCON_CFB32=y
> CONFIG_FBCON_STI=y
FBCON_STI is different than FB_STI.
Sorry, this
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:06:06PM +0200, SteX wrote:
> what kind of graph card does your system work with?
PCI Vis/EG - search this mailing list for part numbers.
> where to find the drivers?
CONFIG_STIFB=y
grab arch/parisc/configs/c3000_config
> is this card a 64bit one?
no. :^(
grant
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:14:26AM +0200, Joel Soete wrote:
...
> > Starting deferred execution scheduler: atd.
> > Starting periodic command scheduler: cron.
> >
> > ^^last msg when using usb and monitor^
The next thing to run would likely be gdm/xdm/kdm (Desktop manager).
ie if X11 isn't
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:00:35PM -0500, Glascock, Donald S. wrote:
> 0. The partitioning software probably works like a dream on Intel
>boxes.
No it doesn't. It's almost as bad - but not quite.
>On hppa, it does not automatically create a PALO
>partition, and it is not clear to me w
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:03:17PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> This curse has been existed for a long time. I would like to know
> that whether we have plan to fix this problem to change as "EAGAIN ==
> EWOULDBLOCK" in the near future. If we decide to keep compatibility
> with HP-UX for a while
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:53:36AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Can you try this sysstat package and see if you still have problems?
> http://www.parisc-linux.org/~carlos/sysstat/
Installed. We'll see if I get any more error messages.
thanks,
grant
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:07:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > It does not. Most of the hppa kernel "team" is using either "testing"
> > or "unstable" for devel and we have no indication of outstanding gcc
> > bugs affecting kernel binary.
>
> Is this true for the 64bit kernels as well?
No.
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 06:43:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > The only trouble report that might be related is palo (boot loader,
> > aka iplboot) built with gcc-3.3.x does NOT work and same source code
> > built with gcc 3.0.x does. We haven't narrowed this down yet as debugging
> > the bo
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 06:01:52PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 02:11]:
> > > What are your plans with gcc-3.0? It seems there are only a few
> > > build-depends on hppa.
> >
> > Let's check, it's used on hppa for:
> > - kernel images
>
> Bdale,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:43:40PM +0200, Roland Leurs wrote:
> I want to use an ISA card in my 715/50. It fits in the expansion slot,
> that's a good beginning. I have to access the card by simple reading and
> writing to an I/O port.
...
> How can I access this card on my Apollo? I am not capabl
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 04:14:12PM +0200, Roland Leurs wrote:
> My PDC Rom version is 1.3
> My IODC Rom version is 1.1
"model" was in the archive: Apollo 715/50
This system firmware can only be upgraded by replacing the chip.
I'm not sure this is a firmware problem but perhaps some
other 715/50 o
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:09:23PM +0200, Roland Leurs wrote:
> But these are both tempory hacks
> because everytime I access the rtc, e.g. give a date command like
>
> date -s "04/30/04 21:00"
>
> the systems locks up. So I think it's a problem in the kernel part for
> accessing the rtc.
I agr
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 06:16:34PM +0200, Roland Leurs wrote:
> I'm having some problems booting my Apollo 715/50 after installing a new
> kernel. I installed palinux-32-2.4.26-pa1_0-2_all.deb and now it keeps
> waiting after setting the system time using the hardware clock. The
> heartbeat led fla
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:00:24AM -0500, Glascock, Donald S. wrote:
> The prevailing feeling here is that the simplest install method
> ought to work:
"simplest" really depends on your PoV.
Technically, CD-ROM is more of a PITA to get working than network
since servers usually only use CD-ROM f
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 10:04:23AM -0500, Glascock, Donald S. wrote:
> Sure -- here are the URLs of the two articles:
>
> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/hypermail/parisc-linux/8360.html
> http://lists.parisc-linux.org/hypermail/parisc-linux/8361.html
thanks
> You're correct that the articles
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:52:14AM -0500, Glascock, Donald S. wrote:
>
> Hi --
>
> We have a handful of rp2430s running HP-UX 11.00 with HP FC
> HPAs installed, which allow them to boot from RAID-protected
> SAN-speed disk space. I haven't been successful at finding
> documents that tell wheth
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 09:57:12AM -0500, Glascock, Donald S. wrote:
>
> Hi, again --
>
> I regret not including the article to which I refer. Here it
> is, in the form of Grant's response to it:
Thanks - but I'd prefer just the URL since it came from the archive.
And that was a fairly very
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:51:15PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> > That the HP9000/710 is not supported?
> why?
I didn't know if 710 ever worked. I was just guessing.
I checked "Supported HW" page and 710 wasn't listed:
http://www.parisc-linux.org/hardware/supported.html
Should I add 7
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:41:43PM +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote:
> I tried to boot with the same cdrom on another workstation (HP9000/710),
> and after a few messages I found a warning:
...
> After that the system hangs, it seems not to react!
> What does it mean?
That the HP9000/710 is not suppo
201 - 300 of 548 matches
Mail list logo
