Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-13 Thread Tyson Whitehead
On Fri October 13 2006 05:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To clarify X hasn't worked since the move from 6.9 but it does run. I get an impressionist image and moveable square which represents the mouse, as I can move it about. My suspicion is some change to the PCI code/memory map as I imagine

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-13 Thread Joni Bäcklund
Strange. I have UP1100 motherboard with ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] controller and total lock up still after unstable was going for Xorg instead of XFree86. Kernel is self compiled 2.16.18 for nautilus. The hardware setup is almost the same and you have no problems.. ? Anyway

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-13 Thread simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Strange. I have UP1100 motherboard with ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] controller and total lock up still after unstable was going for Xorg instead of XFree86. Kernel is self compiled 2.16.18 for nautilus. The hardware setup is almost the same and you

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-12 Thread Simon Brown
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 01:36 -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: Heh, I was somehow expecting it to drop me back into a firmware prompt. After a reboot the bits seemed to still be around, so I attached the output of ser pim. This was with the G200, xorg 7.1.0-1, on the c3700. Nothing from Xorg.0.log

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-04 Thread Ivan Jager
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Ivan Jager wrote: On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Grant Grundler wrote: On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: ... Then it will start cycling between: FLT 500B SYS BD bus timeout FLT CB74 SYS BD bad os HPMC cksm FLT CBFC SYS BD OS HPMC br err FLT CBF0 SYS BD HPMC

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-03 Thread Ivan Jager
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Grant Grundler wrote: On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: ... Then it will start cycling between: FLT 500B SYS BD bus timeout FLT CB74 SYS BD bad os HPMC cksm FLT CBFC SYS BD OS HPMC br err FLT CBF0 SYS BD HPMC initiated To paraphrase, the chassis

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-03 Thread Bob Tracy
Ivan Jager wrote: Yes. Um, for people on debian-alpha: I guess I should have explicitly said I was crossposting to avoid confusion. The fbdev driver with G200 is working on hppa now. (I only tried fbdev with the radeon on alpha, and that didn't work.) For the one or two of us reading this

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-02 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 02:15:42AM -0400, Ivan Jager wrote: ... Then it will start cycling between: FLT 500B SYS BD bus timeout FLT CB74 SYS BD bad os HPMC cksm FLT CBFC SYS BD OS HPMC br err FLT CBF0 SYS BD HPMC initiated To paraphrase, the chassis codes mean: o Someone accessed an address

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-01 Thread Ivan Jager
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Bob Tracy wrote: Bob Tracy wrote: Tomorrow I'll try yanking the ATI card and putting the old TGA2 back in, just to see if Xorg 7.1 will work with the hardware that worked back in the 6.8 days. The good (I think) news is that the TGA2 works fine with the latest Xorg 7.1

Re: Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-01 Thread Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/faq/graphics-howto.html Look for Which non-HP PCI graphics cards work with PA-RISC Linux? On 10/1/06, Ivan Jager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Bob Tracy wrote: Bob Tracy wrote: Tomorrow I'll try yanking the ATI card and putting the old TGA2 back

Re: RES: State of XOrg in testing/unstable

2006-10-01 Thread Bob Tracy
Ivan Jager wrote: Can anyone else with an mga or radeon check whether it is in fact broken on hppa? I'm currently using the fbdev driver with the G200. I can't vouch for it's stability, but it seems to be working. This is encouraging. Haven't tried fbdev on Alpha with 7.1, but it was