work needed on the python2.1 - 2.2 transition
Good news first. It becomes more tedious to track the bug-free packages. Besides the usual serious bugs, the following issues remain: - wxwindows2.2 is still unbuildable in unstable, not yet removed from unstable, package maintainer does not respond. Oh fun! - postgresql: doesn't go to testing due to five serious reports, but doesn't go to testing, because it needs python2.2. This gets difficult ... - out of date packages on some architectures. many on arm, some on ia64, m68k, a few on mips, mipsel, sparc. See below. - we have to wait for the glibc transition to testing, as new binary packages are built. Don't know when this will be ... Maybe all new python related uploads should be urgency medium to not further delay the transition. Matthias PACKAGES NEEDING UPLOADS / WORK postgresql five serious bug reports, depends on python ... python-tal ood the package changed from arch any to all, so excuses still lists this package. sip-qt2 ood m68k listed in excuses, why? other packages depend on sip-qt2 pybliographer ftbfs s390 glibc related problem? reportbug priority problem, should be tagged as pending glimmer ftbfs alpha m68k dependency problem libgnome-vfs0/libgnome-vfs-common pycurl ood m68k not yet built python-gd ood m68k not yet uploaded snappea ood arm m68k mipsel didn't investigate python-qt2 ood m68k ftbfs due to sip-qt2 dependency problem gnumeric ood mipsel no build attempts egenix-mx-base ood arm built, not uploaded python-popy ood arm needs egenix-mx-base be built python-pgsql ood arm needs egenix-mx-base be built python-gtk2 ood mips mipsel / hppa unsatisfiable depends ftbfs, needs config.* update python-ldap ood arm built, not uploaded python-mysqldb ood arm built, not uploaded vtk ood mipsel segfault during build? vtk ftbfs m68k missing build dependency? python-reportlab ood ia64 built, but not uploaded? python-utmp ood ia64 built, but not uploaded? sketch ood ia64 sparc built, but not uploaded? quantlib-python ood arm no build attempts libming ftbfs hppa ia64 preparing NMU (doko) python-opengl ftbfs need to check, if the report is already fixed, but not closed. python-qt ood m68k STATUS WAITING (2002-10-22): 9 mcfoo pyne python-davlib python-stats python-tclink 8 garchiver libmp3hip python-biggles python-unit snappea 7 forg plplot 6 dput libapache-mod-python python-optik 5 pybliographer pycurl 4 python-htmltmpl python-tal 0 ecasound linda python-japanes-codecs vte NEW IN UNSTABLE, NO OLDER PACKAGE IN TESTING subversion subversion-snapshot wxwindows2.3 sqlrelay buggy, package maintainer does not respond ldaptor buggy gnue-forms buggy due to python2-base dependency
RETURNED EMAIL
Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list. You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following link or copy and paste the link to your browser http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.html?emailto= debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RETURNED EMAIL
Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list. You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following link or copy and paste the link to your browser http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.html?emailto= debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could someone please block this from the lists? -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Re: RETURNED EMAIL
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 10:29, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list. You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following link or copy and paste the link to your browser http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.html?emailto= debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could someone please block this from the lists? And could someone please submit the develop.nmdg.com server to as many RBL lists as you can ?? The webform they have is even worse than formmail.pl. -- Tot ziens, Bart-Jan Vrielink
Re: RETURNED EMAIL
Hi Alfred! You wrote: And could someone please submit the develop.nmdg.com server to as many RBL lists as you can ?? The webform they have is even worse than formmail.pl. A simpler solution is just to ignore it. So, I presume that you don't get any spam? -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Re: RETURNED EMAIL
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, I presume that you don't get any spam? Sure I do, a lot of it to. But it is actually faster and saves you more time if you just ignore the spam. And complaining about spam is just as bad as spam anyway. Cheers, -- Alfred M. Szmidt
Re: non-US sources.list for woody
Here's my current sources.list deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main when I try to suckmyserver:/var/lib/apt/lists# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18 I get Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package kernel-source-2.4.18 has no available version, but exists in the database. This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents of sources.list E: Package kernel-source-2.4.18 has no installation candidate or suckmyserver:/var/lib/apt/lists# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.17-hppa Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done E: Couldn't find package kernel-source-2.4.17-hppa even suckmyserver:/var/lib/apt/lists# apt-get source kernel-source-2.4.18 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done E: Unable to find a source package for kernel-source dosn't work I'm new to this Debian thing. My previous distros are Slackware and I currently use gentoo on my desktop boxes. I have read the HOWTO but still can't figure out whats wrong here. Could someone help me download the new kernel sources please. Thanks, Aidan
Re: non-US sources.list for woody
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:57:31AM +0100, Aidan Delaney wrote: Here's my current sources.list deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main when I try to suckmyserver:/var/lib/apt/lists# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18 that's because non-US is for packages which aren't allowed to be distributed from the US, not for people outside the US. you should also add lines such as: deb http://mirror.direct.ca/linux/debian/ stable main non-free contrib deb-src http://mirror.direct.ca/linux/debian/ stable main non-free contrib though i wouldn't actually recommend using mirror.direct.ca as they're missing some packages. there's a list of mirrors somewhere on debian.org -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.
Re: RETURNED EMAIL
On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 05:07 AM, Hermes wrote: Your email was rejected because it was not on the recipient's accept list. You may however send the recipient an email by clicking on the following link or copy and paste the link to your browser http://develop.nmdg.com/sendemail.html?emailto= debian- [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] You do realize that both postfix and exim have ass-kickin' rulesets to help send spammers into /dev/null ??? Guess not... -Sx- _ Well, in general, the thing I don't like about other computer languages is that they're not Perl. -Larry Wall
12 main items ( GGG-1 )
THE GATOSON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Our Ref.: 12 main items (GGG-1)23rd Oct. 2002 Dear Sir, We can get the follow good quality products which made in China at the SPECIAL LOWEST PRICES. If you are interested them, kindly contact us by return e-mail, we will inform you our WEBSITE for them by e-mail immed., you can visit our website and let us your instructions. ANY OTHER INQUIRIES ARE WELCOME. Thanks again for your kindly assistance and waiting for your instructions. Best Regards THE GATOSON (HOLDINGS) LTD. Alex Cheng General Manager A wearing and accouterment A01 man garment A02 lady garment A03 children garment A04 silk dress A05 leather/fur dress A06 knitting dress A07 full dress A08 sportswear and leisurewear A09 uniform A10 underwear and nightwear A11 accouterment and accessories A12 shoes A13 others B electricity electronic product B01 electronic appliance for kitchen B02 telephone B03 computer B04 television set B05 air conditioning B06 audio and video facility B07 sanitary products B08 washing machine B09 water fountain B10 VCD/DVD player B11 refrigerator B12 water heater B13 mobile phone B14 digital products B15 others C machinery and equipment C01 food, beverage tobacco machine C02 foodstuff machine C03 dyeing machine for textile C04 sewing machine for dress C05 leather/shoes machine C06 paper machine C07 paper products machine C08 press machine/equipment C09 Medical equipments C10 envir.pro.machinery/equipment C11 chemical machinery/equipment C12 construction machinery/equipment C13 engineering machinery C14 electronic/electrical machinery C15 others D vehicle D01 sanitation truck series D02 traveling bus D03 passenger car D04 agricultural vehicles D05 carring truck D06 saloon car D07 mini bus D08 bus D09 motorcycle D10 bicycle D11 fire truck series D12 cement tanker D13 concrete mixing truck D14 drumper D15 others E ship and spare parts E01 yacht and speed boat E02 oil tanker E03 cargo vessel E04 submarine vessel E05 passenger vessel E06 battery boat E07 rowing boat E08 treading boat E09 fishing boat E10 special vessel E11 others F sports products F01 ball F02 ski and skate shoes F03 gymnastic equipment F04 model F05 traveling products F06 swimming outfit F07 others G office equipment stationery G01 office furniture G02 office stationery G03 office equipment G04 copier G05 fax machine G06 scraping machine G07 scanner G08 printer G09 blueprint machine G10 others H daily commodity H01 dishware and kitchenware H02 furniture H03 decoration H04 clock and watch H05 cleaning article H06 domestic textile H07 clothes rack and clothes pin H08 lighter and smoking set H09 knife and scissors H10 umbrella and raincoat H11 glasses H12 others J industrial control/automatization J01 automatic apparatus parts J02 robot and mechanical hands) J03 automatic system J04 automatic instrument J05 others K paper products K01 toilet paper K02 paper package K03 others L Oilfield equipments L01 Welhead equipment X-mas tree blowout preventers L02 Drill-Stem testing tools new series perforating guns L03 Pumping units L04 F-series triplex mud pumps L05 Drilling producting accessories L06 Drilling rigs L07 Others M aerospace products aircrafts M01 Aircrafts M02 Aerospace equipment M03 Others
Re: Recovery from bad kernel
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 07:13:35PM +0100, Aidan Delaney wrote: Let's suppose (for a moment) that I'm an itiot who had a perfectly good system but recompiled the kernel and booted into it. Suppose also that the palo.conf file points to 2\vmlinux-2.4.18 and a recovery kernel at /boot/vmlinux-2.4.17-r39 (or somthing). If the 2.4.18 kernel fails halfway through boot, how do I get palo to revert to using the recovery kernel? you need to `interact with isl' (maybe specify `ipl' on the boot line, depends what kind of firmware you have), then edit the command line using the fancy editor paul designed, and specify 2\vmlinux-2.4.17-r39 instead. I think ;-) -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.
