On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Grant Grundler grantgrund...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:28 PM, John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
wrote:
I was trying to say in a round about manner that debian ports can't be used
to update parisc systems running squeeze or unstable any longer because of
the problem noted. It's probably still ok for systems running lenny.
Ok.
lenny isn't provided from ports, it's provided from the main archive
(being an official part of the release).
I would say based on my experience that Debian package maintainers are still
willing to respond to parisc related bugs. Most packages don't have parisc
specific
problems, so the situation isn't completely unrecoverable, but we need an
unstable
buildd that is monitored by the small core of toolchain and kernel
maintainers.
Agreed. IIRC, dannf volunteered to operate/maintain a buildd but was
waiting for stable kernel to be released and I don't if that
happened. My understand was recent kernel.org was more stable. Let's
see dannf is still available/interested in operating a buildd get an
update on what he thinks he needs to move forward.
Just for the record, I have a rp3440 available with reasonable
bandwidth to act as an autobuilder. It needs a (remote) admin, but
it's there, if someone wants to step up.
Cheers,
T-Bone
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hppa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CA+DQjFhpLAwmzUW=nq7SJ8ypCyhPYaNHyCSiokZoGxMiQ=m...@mail.gmail.com
