On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:55:27PM -0700, Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:13:46AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
A load or store from or to an unaligned address. eg a load-word from
an address that's not congruent to 0 mod 4. these are emulated, so the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 06:47:32AM +, Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:34:22PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
Couldn't it happen with optimizer bugs ? (we compile with -O2 on hppa,
in case that would have an influence, could someone try a build
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show
objections
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:07:44AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are there plans to make hppa machines available to developers in the
near future ? The current ones (paer, penalosa, peri, and sarti) are
either
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 03:29:29PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:13:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:07:44AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Are there plans
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:27:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
PS: FWIW, I need to debug the xptcstubs in the xulrunner package.
Thanks to access given by Thibaut, I was able to tackle this problem,
but I now need a hppa wizard help to solve.
What is happening is that the assembly code in
xpcom
6 matches
Mail list logo
