Re: Bug#151886: status of report #151886? / feedback
Camm Maguire writes: Greetings! Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [keeping all the people in the CC] Scanning the reports, I see Matthew Wilcox beeing asked about: In either case, I will need a knowledgeable hppa person to advise, discuss and help generate patches for this to get fixed any time soon. Gcl can build its own bfd library, so patches here can be simply incorporated. willy would be a good target. I'm going to be out of town for a couple of weeks, but (if it's still pending) I'd be happy to help when I get back. Camm, another try with the current (20021227) gcc-snapshot package (now branched to become gcc-3.3 sometime). I forget which of the several gcc difficulties I'd been having with GCL on hppa to which this note referred. yes, the report got long ... In any case, I see I'm going to have a problem with 3.3: /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:4:2: #error GCC no longer implements varargs.h. /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:5:2: #error Revise your code to use stdarg.h. Fixing this will take considerable effort. Is there a work around to get varargs under 3.3? I don't think so: 2002-07-15 Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ginclude/varargs.h: Replace with stub which issues #error. * ginclude/stdarg.h: __builtin_stdarg_start is renamed __builtin_va_start. [...] * doc/invoke.texi, doc/sourcebuild.texi, doc/tm.texi, doc/trouble.texi: Remove references to GCC-provided varargs.h.
status of report #151886? / feedback
[keeping all the people in the CC] Scanning the reports, I see Matthew Wilcox beeing asked about: In either case, I will need a knowledgeable hppa person to advise, discuss and help generate patches for this to get fixed any time soon. Gcl can build its own bfd library, so patches here can be simply incorporated. willy would be a good target. I'm going to be out of town for a couple of weeks, but (if it's still pending) I'd be happy to help when I get back. Camm, another try with the current (20021227) gcc-snapshot package (now branched to become gcc-3.3 sometime).
Re: status of report #151886? / feedback
Greetings! Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [keeping all the people in the CC] Scanning the reports, I see Matthew Wilcox beeing asked about: In either case, I will need a knowledgeable hppa person to advise, discuss and help generate patches for this to get fixed any time soon. Gcl can build its own bfd library, so patches here can be simply incorporated. willy would be a good target. I'm going to be out of town for a couple of weeks, but (if it's still pending) I'd be happy to help when I get back. Camm, another try with the current (20021227) gcc-snapshot package (now branched to become gcc-3.3 sometime). I forget which of the several gcc difficulties I'd been having with GCL on hppa to which this note referred. In any case, I see I'm going to have a problem with 3.3: /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:4:2: #error GCC no longer implements varargs.h. /home/camm/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcc-lib/hppa-linux/3.3/include/varargs.h:5:2: #error Revise your code to use stdarg.h. Fixing this will take considerable effort. Is there a work around to get varargs under 3.3? Take care, -- Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED] == The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens. -- Baha'u'llah
