Package: ruby1.9.1
Version: 1.9.2.290-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hello,
ruby FTBFS on hurd-i386 due to dirent misuse. The attach patch fixes it
the same way as Solaris. I have already forwarded it to m...@netlab.jp
last monday, but didn't
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
This idea must come from libacl-dev.
And really in
/lib/libacl.la
i read
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
libattr.la is not shipped any more. That would be
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
libisofs not building was becoming more and more a problem, so I patched
the libacl.la file by hand (yes, a bad thing).
A change in the Debian package configurations of libisofs and libisoburn
for hurd-i386 would avoid unnecessary problems.
Currently the support for
Thomas Schmitt, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 12:51:33 +0200, a écrit :
It would suffice to simply not install libacl1-dev and libattr1-dev,
when libisofs and libisoburn get built. ./configure will then create
a Makefile which does not try to use libacl or xattr functions.
This can be done by using
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 12:54:25 +0200, a écrit :
Thomas Schmitt, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 12:51:33 +0200, a écrit :
It would suffice to simply not install libacl1-dev and libattr1-dev,
when libisofs and libisoburn get built. ./configure will then create
a Makefile which does not try
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:36:27PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.51-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
currently acl does not compile on hurd-i386. The problem is a PATH_MAX
definition which is not supported on
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
This idea must come from libacl-dev.
And really in
/lib/libacl.la
i read
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr,
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 21:55:10 +1000, a écrit :
I don't have a hurd system and would like to know if acl compiled with
the first patch still works correctly on a hurd system.
If you are a DD, you can connect to strauss. If you are not, just ask
and I'll setup an account
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 22:10:25 +1000, a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:01:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
This idea must come from libacl-dev.
And really in
/lib/libacl.la
i read
dependency_libs='
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 21:55 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:36:27PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.51-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hi,
currently acl does not compile on
Svante Signell, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 15:00:10 +0200, a écrit :
I don't have a hurd system and would like to know if acl compiled with
the first patch still works correctly on a hurd system.
I would assume it would build OK. Currently this package is more or less
a dummy packages since it
On 29/08/11 at 13:06 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
If you take a list of packages that failed on $PORTER_ARCH, but built
fine on at least two or three other architectures, do you really expect
to get many false positives (i.e, non-arch-specific problems)?
Such a list would be easy to generate
On 08/29/2011 11:01 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Thomas Schmitt, le Sat 27 Aug 2011 21:54:31 +0200, a écrit :
This idea must come from libacl-dev.
And really in
/lib/libacl.la
i read
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libattr.la'
Yes, that's the problem: it should rather be a -lattr, because
Package: libhdf4
Version: 4.2r4-12
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Inlined below is an updated patch supporting both kfreebsd and hurd. Its
previous name was kfreebsd. An appropriate new name would be kfreebsd
+gnu.
Index:
Package: libhdf4
Version: 4.2r4-12
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Inlined below is an updated patch supporting both kfreebsd and hurd. Its
previous name was kfreebsd. An appropriate new name would be kfreebsd
+gnu.
Index:
Thomas Schmitt, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 22:54:08 +0200, a écrit :
does errno -303 announce bigger trouble ?
Probably yes: the query/reply IPC ping-pong got disturbed somehow.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
does errno -303 announce bigger trouble ?
Probably yes: the query/reply IPC ping-pong got disturbed somehow.
Here is a minimal C example:
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
#include errno.h
int main()
{
int ret;
17 matches
Mail list logo
