Re: kfreebsd-9 FTBFS on hurd-i386

On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 12:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Hi, Please can someone look at this? I suspect GNU/Hurd is picking up the *BSD case and including db.h instead of db_185.h. https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kfreebsd-9arch=hurd-i386ver=9.0~svn224126-1stamp=1310983351 I

Re: kfreebsd-9 FTBFS on hurd-i386

Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 13:50:30 +0200, a écrit : /usr/bin/ld.bfd.real: target not found There are two spaces there, so it's probably an empty variable. You should check what was supposed to put content in it. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

net-acct?

Hi, I managed to get net-acct-0.71-9 to build on GNU/Hurd. Any interest to finish the patch? This package is dead upstream and we have tcpdump already. Svante -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: net-acct?

Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 16:16:35 +0200, a écrit : I managed to get net-acct-0.71-9 to build on GNU/Hurd. Any interest to finish the patch? This package is dead upstream and we have tcpdump already. Well, in fact tcpdump does not work. Does net-acct actually works? Samuel -- To

Re: net-acct?

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 16:16:35 +0200, a écrit : I managed to get net-acct-0.71-9 to build on GNU/Hurd. Any interest to finish the patch? This package is dead upstream and we have tcpdump already. Well, in fact tcpdump

atop?

Hi, I managed to get atop-1.23 to build on GNU/Hurd. Any interest to finish the patch, there is top already? atop works except for network interfaces, since we don't have /proc/net/dev. I can modify the code to at least list the interfaces using 'inetutils-ifconfig -as'. And when starting it

Why does su change PATH on amd64 but not on hurd-i386 ?

Hi, i guess it is not intentional that on a freshly installed Debian GNU/Hurd $ su Password: # apt-get install libacl1-dev fails with ... Get:2 http://jk.fr.eu.org/debian/hurd-installer/mirror/ sid/main libacl1-dev hurd-i386 2.2.47-3 [78.1 kB] Fetched 119 kB in 0s (373 kB/s)

Re: Why does su change PATH on amd64 but not on hurd-i386 ?

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 22:15 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, i guess it is not intentional that on a freshly installed Debian GNU/Hurd $ su Password: PATH looks like inherited from my normal user. # echo $PATH /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/home/thomas

Re: Why does su change PATH on amd64 but not on hurd-i386 ?

Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 23:21:34 +0200, a écrit : On the hosting Debian GNU/Linux amd64 i see $ echo $PATH /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/home/thomas $ su Password: # echo $PATH

Re: Why does su change PATH on amd64 but not on hurd-i386 ?

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 23:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 23:21:34 +0200, a écrit : On the hosting Debian GNU/Linux amd64 i see $ echo $PATH /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/home/thomas $ su Password: # echo

Re: Why does su change PATH on amd64 but not on hurd-i386 ?

Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 23:30:02 +0200, a écrit : On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 23:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 23:21:34 +0200, a écrit : On the hosting Debian GNU/Linux amd64 i see $ echo $PATH

Why does su change PATH on amd64 but not on hurd-i386 ?

Hi, Svante Signell wrote: Debian has fixed this already. Samuel Thibault wrote In Debian Linux, yes. But we still have the issue on Debian Hurd. There is no reason why we shouldn't be able to get the same behavior. I would like to understand how this miracle works on my amd64 installation