Re: suggested fix

2012-06-21 Thread Nicholas Bamber
On 20/06/12 22:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote: You still didn't address that in your reply. Steven, You seem to have three issues: 1.) feature based tests rather than platform based tests. I totally get the desirability of this. It means new OS 's or improvements to OS's get picked up

Processed: splitting bug report

2012-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 675836 -1 Bug #675836 [src:pmacct] pmacct: FTBFS[!linux]: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type Bug 675836 cloned as bug 678375 678375 was not blocked by any bugs. 678375 was blocking: 671115 Added blocking bug(s) of 678375:

Processed: blocking

2012-06-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # perl block 678376 by 678358 Bug #678376 [src:perl] src:perl: Please check use of AF_LINK with repect to Hurd 678376 was not blocked by any bugs. 678376 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 678376: 678358 # netifaces block

Re: suggested fix

2012-06-21 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote: 3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a point. To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away and keep the intended functionality once the cause had been

Re: Patch for libpst (for review)

2012-06-21 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 01:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: Hi! On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:10:17 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: If there is a need to build pst2dii that .cpp-file has to be patched too (not done yet). Looks like it will be enabled if the right version of /usr/bin/convert is found

Re: suggested fix

2012-06-21 Thread Nicholas Bamber
On 21/06/12 11:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote: 3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a point. To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away and keep

Re: suggested fix

2012-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Nicholas Bamber, le Thu 21 Jun 2012 13:04:17 +0100, a écrit : ++/* As per #678358, Hurd defines AF_LINK but does not ++ * provide the functionality. When that bug is fixed ++ * These three lines could be removed and #678375 closed. ++ */ ++#ifdef __GNU__ ++#undef AF_LINK ++#endif I'm

Still more netdde problems

2012-06-21 Thread peter
I'm really sorry to bother you again. But i'm at my wits end. I still can't get networking up and running, basically the hurd won't recognize my network cards. This is what i have done so far: 1.) Upgraded netdde to: netdde_0.0.20120520-2_hurd-i386.deb 2.) Compiled netdde from source. I