Christoph Egger wrote:
It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided
hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes.
That's annoying.
To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an
unofficial repo, and that doesn't sound like something DSA could
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes:
Christoph Egger wrote:
It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided
hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes.
That's annoying.
To provide stable/security support ourselves, it seemed we'd need an
unofficial
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +, a écrit :
Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no
security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are
therefore none of their machines DSA?
We are still stuck in the not released arch = no DSA
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 12:05:06 +, a écrit :
Although, how is that handled for hurd-i386? I assume it has no
security support, there may be some unofficial packages used; are
therefore none of their machines DSA?
We are
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Peter Palfrader, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:39:02 +0100, a écrit :
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We are still stuck in the not released arch = no DSA machine = not
released arch loop.
Except that it's not a loop. DSA has indicated
Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We are still stuck in the not released arch = no DSA machine = not
released arch loop.
Except that it's not a loop. DSA has indicated time and time again that
if an arch qualifies for a release in all other aspects, we'd
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 11 Nov 2014 13:41:18 +, a écrit :
Practically it would be an 'official Debian port', and we'd have all the
usual things like install media.
I wouldn't call it official, but I agree on the rest. Getting hurt
by sid bugs is always a pain, and you can not have users
Hello,
2014-11-11 14:41 GMT+01:00 Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Anyway, I'm really hopeful now. weasel suggested a 'jessie-kfreebsd'
suite could still be supported by FTP team. (Actually, could that be
named
Svante Signell, le Mon 10 Nov 2014 17:59:45 +0100, a écrit :
Previously glibc-2.19-* built fine with fakeroot-hurd (no testsuite),
but the latest version does not: glibc-2.19-14~0:
But what previously is exactly? Did you try to downgrade the libc or
hurd installed on your box? Note that I
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 00:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 10 Nov 2014 17:59:45 +0100, a écrit :
Previously glibc-2.19-* built fine with fakeroot-hurd (no testsuite),
but the latest version does not: glibc-2.19-14~0:
But what previously is exactly? Did you try to
Svante Signell, le Wed 12 Nov 2014 00:16:37 +0100, a écrit :
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 00:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 10 Nov 2014 17:59:45 +0100, a écrit :
Previously glibc-2.19-* built fine with fakeroot-hurd (no testsuite),
but the latest version does not:
Package: isc-dhcp-client
Version: 4.3.1-5
Severity: important
Hello,
Running
dhclient -6 -r
basically hangs for one minute before returning. Running
dhclient -1 -6 -r
does finish. dhclient.c reads as
if (release mode) {
#ifndef DHCPv6
return 0;
#else
hurd_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hurd_0.5.git20141108-4.dsc
hurd_0.5.git20141108-4.debian.tar.bz2
hurd-libs0.3_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.deb
hurd_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.deb
hurd-dev_0.5.git20141108-4_hurd-i386.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:57:23 +
Source: hurd
Binary: hurd-libs0.3 hurd hurd-dev hurd-dbg hurd-doc hurd-libs0.3-udeb hurd-udeb
Architecture: source hurd-i386 all
Version: 1:0.5.git20141108-4
Distribution: unstable
14 matches
Mail list logo
