Re: [Fwd: Updated: Packages remaining at debian-ports]

2012-04-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 23 Apr 2012 07:25:23 +0200, a écrit : On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 22:31 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Sun 22 Apr 2012 22:18:23 +0200, a écrit : Summary of packages left at Debian-ports: 2012-04-22 Comments should be on the wiki page. Otherwise they

Re: [Fwd: Updated: Packages remaining at debian-ports]

2012-04-23 Thread Svante Signell
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 11:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Mon 23 Apr 2012 07:25:23 +0200, a écrit : On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 22:31 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Sun 22 Apr 2012 22:18:23 +0200, a écrit : Summary of packages left at Debian-ports:

Re: [Fwd: Updated: Packages remaining at debian-ports]

2012-04-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Mon 23 Apr 2012 11:42:50 +0200, a écrit : I think ifupdown is over my head. What about libdrm, create a dummy target as you did for libusb? See the wiki page: This is just a stub, and not so useful anyway. Forget about it. A stub will perhaps make drm packages build, but

Re: [Fwd: Updated: Packages remaining at debian-ports]

2012-04-23 Thread Pino Toscano
Alle lunedì 23 aprile 2012, Svante Signell ha scritto: Yes, of course, but now I have a good grip on what's left to do: I'll continue with the psmisc, webkit, lockdev, sane-backend-extras issues, in that order, OK? I think ifupdown is over my head. What about libdrm, create a dummy target as

Re: [Fwd: Updated: Packages remaining at debian-ports]

2012-04-22 Thread Svante Signell
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 22:31 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Svante Signell, le Sun 22 Apr 2012 22:18:23 +0200, a écrit : Summary of packages left at Debian-ports: 2012-04-22 Comments should be on the wiki page. Otherwise they get lost. Ok, I didn't look at the wiki page this time. Good that