Justus Winter, le Fri 31 Jan 2014 11:57:30 +0100, a écrit :
> 2. We are currently switching to sysvinit for Debian/Hurd. All the
> Hurd patches are in place, patches for the sysvinit package are
> awaiting inclusion.
They are included, and just awaiting upload now.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 12:53 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 31/01/14 10:57, Justus Winter wrote:
> But if for example you'd planned to maintain OpenRC-specific runscripts
> instead, that would be a reason for kFreeBSD to consider using OpenRC.
We are currently working on getting openrc to w
On 31/01/14 10:57, Justus Winter wrote:
> 1. Up to this day, Debian/Hurd has never used the current default init
> system (sysvinit) but has relied on its own init and rc system. We
> are prepared to use a non-default init system in the future.
This will become increasingly difficult when SysV in
Hi,
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2014-01-30 16:14:44)
> Since you didn't mention Upstart in this draft, may I ask your point of
> view on it? Is there any prospect/interest in using it on GNU/Hurd?
I deliberately did not express any preference or mention neither
upstart nor systemd. I'll update
Hi,
Since you didn't mention Upstart in this draft, may I ask your point of
view on it? Is there any prospect/interest in using it on GNU/Hurd?
What if it becomes the default, or the second-most popular init system
in Debian? Or if it is used by GNU/kFreeBSD for jessie?
The main benefit I see
Hi :)
we talked in #hurd about stating our position in the ongoing debate
about Debians default init system. Here is my draft.
~~~ snip ~~~
We, the Debian/Hurd porters and developers, like to state our position
in the current debate about the default init system for Debian.
1. Up to this day, D
6 matches
Mail list logo
